Yield enhancement in plants by modulation of ap2 transcription factor

ABSTRACT

Compositions and methods for modulating flower organ development, leaf formation, phototropism, apical dominance, fruit development, initiation of roots and for increasing yield in a plant are provided. The compositions include an AP2 transcription factor sequence. Compositions of the invention comprise amino acid sequences and nucleotide sequences selected from SEQ ID NOS: 1-11 as well as variants and fragments thereof. Nucleotide sequences encoding the AP2 transcription factors are provided in DNA constructs for expression in a plant of interest are provided for modulating the level of an AP2 transcription factor sequence in a plant or a plant part are provided. The methods comprise introducing into a plant or plant part a heterologous polynucleotide comprising an AP2 transcription factor sequence of the invention. The level of the AP2 transcription factor polypeptide can be increased or decreased. Such method can be used to increase the yield in plants; in one embodiment, the method is used to increase grain yield in cereals.

CROSS-REFERENCE

This utility application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser.No. 12/773,070 filed May 4, 2010 which claims the benefit of U.S.Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/175,087, filed May 4, 2009, both ofwhich are incorporated herein by reference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is drawn to the field of genetics and molecularbiology. More particularly, the compositions and methods are directed tomodulation of transcription and improving yield in plants.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Grain yield improvements by conventional breeding have nearly reached aplateau in crop plants. It is natural then to explore some alternative,non-conventional approaches that could be employed to obtain furtheryield increases.

Technologic developments continually advance in an effort to address theneed to increase plant yield in order to feed the expanding worldpopulation. Biotechnology is playing an increasingly important role inthis effort by providing, for example, plants having increasedresistance to drought and insect infestation. For many plants such ascorn, rice and soybean, seed provides the source of food products,including grain and can be eaten directly or processed into flour, milkproducts and the like. For other plants, edible seeds, roots, stems,leaves, bulbs and tubers provide a source of vegetables. Fruits, whichare the ripened reproductive body of plants, also are an important foodsource.

Because many foods are derived, either directly or indirectly, as aresult of plant flowering, methods for increasing flowering efficiencyand numbers of flowers produced of plants can result in increased yield.Further, while providing a means to increase yield of crop plants, suchtools also can be useful in the ornamental plant industry, providing,for example, a means to increase the number and/or size of flowersproduced by a plant.

Nearly all crops may be benefited by the manipulation of growth anddevelopment characteristics. As such, mutations in the reception andsignal transduction of gibberellins leading to dwarf-like plants havebeen described as advantageous in many crop plants (U.S. Pat. No.6,307,126; U.S. Pat. No. 6,762,348; U.S. Pat. No. 6,830,930; U.S. Pat.No. 6,794,560). This was especially true in high-yielding, semi-dwarfwheat varieties where the reduced plant stature was most advantageous inincreasing grain production per plant and superior straw strength. Theshorter, stronger straw greatly reduces the losses resulting fromlodging or flattening of the standing wheat plants by rain and highwinds. In addition a concomitant increase in harvest index was evidentshifting more photoassimilates from vegetative growth components to thegrain.

Methods and compositions are needed in the art which can employ suchsequences to modulate harvest index and yield in plants.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Compositions and methods of the invention comprise and employ AP2transcription factor polypeptides and polynucleotides that are involvedin modulating plant development, morphology, and physiology.

The compositions include AP2 transcription factor sequences fromArabidopsis and soybean (Glycine max). Compositions of the inventioncomprise amino acid sequences and nucleotide sequences selected from SEQID NOS: 1-5 as well as variants and fragments thereof.

Nucleotide sequences encoding the AP2 transcription factor are providedin DNA constructs for expression in a plant of interest. Expressioncassettes, plants, plant cells, plant parts, and seeds comprising thesequences of the invention are further provided. In specificembodiments, the polynucleotide is operably linked to a constitutivepromoter.

Methods for modulating the level of an AP2 transcription factor sequencein a plant or a plant part are provided. The methods compriseintroducing into a plant or plant part a heterologous polynucleotidecomprising an AP2 transcription factor sequence, an AP2 DNA bindingdomain, or an AP2 TRANSCRIPTION activation domain of the invention. Thelevel of the AP2 transcription factor polypeptide can be increased ordecreased. Such method can be used to increase the yield in plants; inone embodiment, the method is used to increase grain yield in cropplants.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1 provides an alignment of several AP2 transcription factorsequences from Zea mays, Arabidopsis thaliana, Oryza sativum, andAntirrhinum majus. The AP2 transcription factor consensus domain issingle-underlined and the polyserine and polyglycine consensus domainsare double underlined.

FIG. 2. Alignment of the Arabidopsis AP2 and soybean AP2 sequence.

FIG. 3. Plant transformation vector expressing the Arabidopsis AP2 gene(AT-AP2 TF1) under the control of the constitutive SCP1 promoter.

FIG. 4. Plant transformation vector expressing the Arabidopsis AP2 gene(AT-AP2 TF1) under the control of the constitutive AT-UBQ10 promoter.

FIG. 5. Plant transformation vector expressing the Soybean AP2 gene(GM-AP2-2) under the control of the constitutive SCP1 promoter.

FIG. 6. Plant transformation vector expressing the Soybean AP2 gene(GM-AP2-2) under the control of the constitutive AT-UBQ10 promoter.

FIG. 7. Plants over-expressing AT-AP2 have increased bolt number andsilique number. Three transgenic plants over-expressing the AT-AP2 geneare shown (plants 1-3) relative to a non-transgenic wild-type controlplant (C).

FIG. 8. Increase in bolt number (A) and silique number (B) in transgenicArabidopsis over-expressing AT-AP2. The average bolt number from twelveT1 generation transgenic Arabidopsis lines and six non-transgenicwild-type control plants are presented in panel A. The silique numberfrom a transgenic line over-expressing AT-AP2 (four plants) and anon-transgenic line (seven plants) are shown in panel B.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present inventions now will be described more fully hereinafter withreference to the accompanying drawings, in which some, but not allembodiments of the inventions are shown. Indeed, these inventions may beembodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limitedto the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments areprovided so that this disclosure will satisfy applicable legalrequirements.

Many modifications and other embodiments of the inventions set forthherein will come to mind to one skilled in the art to which theseinventions pertain having the benefit of the teachings presented in theforegoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is tobe understood that the inventions are not to be limited to the specificembodiments disclosed and that modifications and other embodiments areintended to be included within the scope of the appended claims.Although specific terms are employed herein, they are used in a genericand descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation.

I. Overview

Methods and compositions are provided to promote floral organdevelopment, root initiation, and yield, and for modulating leafformation, phototropism, apical dominance, fruit development and thelike, in plants. The compositions and methods of the invention result inimproved plant or crop yield by modulating in a plant the level of atleast one AP2 transcription factor polypeptide or a polypeptide having abiologically active variant or fragment of an AP2 transcription factorpolypeptide of the invention.

II. Compositions

Compositions of the invention include AP2 transcription factorpolynucleotides and polypeptides and variants and fragments thereof thatare involved in regulating transcription. AP2 transcription factorencodes a plant protein with an AP2 domain. In addition, a nuclearlocalization signal for transport to the nucleus as well as polyserineand polyglycine domains are present in the AP2 protein. By“corresponding to” is intended that the recited amino acid positions foreach domain relate to the amino acid positions of the recited SEQ ID NO,and that polypeptides comprising these domains may be found by aligningthe polypeptides with the recited SEQ ID NO: using standard alignmentmethods.

The AP2 transcription factor sequences of the invention act asactivators or repressors of transcription of effector genes orregulators. While not bound by any theory of mechanism, AP2transcription factor may control aspects of plant development importantfor the establishment of yield forming structures such as flowers orflower branches.

AP2 transcription factor is expressed at very low levels and isundetectable by MPSS profiling. Low levels of AP2 expression suggest itencodes a tightly regulated control factor and that ectopic expressionof AP2 results in a plant with altered plant morphology that maypositively impact plant yield.

As used herein, a “AP2 transcription factor” or “AP2 transcriptionfactor” sequence comprises a polynucleotide encoding or a polypeptidehaving the AP2 transcription factor domain or a biologically activevariant or fragment of the AP2 transcription factor domain. See, forexample, Jurata and Gill, (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:5688-98 and Franks,et al., (2002) Development 129:253-63.

In one embodiment, the present invention provides isolated AP2transcription factor polypeptides comprising amino acid sequences asshown in SEQ ID NOS: 2 and 4 and fragments and variants thereof. Furtherprovided are polynucleotides comprising the nucleotide sequence setforth in SEQ ID NO: 1 and sequences comprising a polynucleotide encodingan AP2 domain (SEQ ID NO: 5).

The invention encompasses isolated or substantially purifiedpolynucleotide or protein compositions. An “isolated” or “purified”polynucleotide or protein, or biologically active portion thereof, issubstantially or essentially free from components that normallyaccompany or interact with the polynucleotide or protein as found in itsnaturally occurring environment. Thus, an isolated or purifiedpolynucleotide or protein is substantially free of other cellularmaterial or culture medium when produced by recombinant techniques, orsubstantially free of chemical precursors or other chemicals whenchemically synthesized. Optimally, an “isolated” polynucleotide is freeof sequences (optimally protein encoding sequences) that naturally flankthe polynucleotide (i.e., sequences located at the 5′ and 3′ ends of thepolynucleotide) in the genomic DNA of the organism from which thepolynucleotide is derived. For example, in various embodiments, theisolated polynucleotide can contain less than about 5 kb, 4 kb, 3 kb, 2kb, 1 kb, 0.5 kb or 0.1 kb of nucleotide sequence that naturally flankthe polynucleotide in genomic DNA of the cell from which thepolynucleotide is derived. A protein that is substantially free ofcellular material includes preparations of protein having less thanabout 30%, 20%, 10%, 5% or 1% (by dry weight) of contaminating protein.When the protein of the invention or biologically active portion thereofis recombinantly produced, optimally culture medium represents less thanabout 30%, 20%, 10%, 5% or 1% (by dry weight) of chemical precursors ornon-protein-of-interest chemicals.

Fragments and variants of the AP2 transcription factor domain or AP2transcription factor polynucleotides and proteins encoded thereby arealso encompassed by the methods and compositions of the presentinvention. By “fragment” is intended a portion of the polynucleotide ora portion of the amino acid sequence. Fragments of a polynucleotide mayencode protein fragments that retain the biological activity of thenative protein and hence regulate transcription. For example,polypeptide fragments will comprise the AP2 transcription factor domain(SEQ ID NO: 5) or the polyserine (SEQ ID NOS: 7-11) or polyglycinedomain (SEQ ID NO: 6). In some embodiments, the polypeptide fragmentwill comprise both the AP2 transcription factor domain and thepolyserine or polyglutamine domain. Alternatively, fragments that areused for suppressing or silencing (i.e., decreasing the level ofexpression) of an AP2 transcription factor sequence need not encode aprotein fragment, but will retain the ability to suppress expression ofthe target sequence. In addition, fragments that are useful ashybridization probes generally do not encode fragment proteins retainingbiological activity. Thus, fragments of a nucleotide sequence may rangefrom at least about 18 nucleotides, about 20 nucleotides, about 50nucleotides, about 100 nucleotides and up to the full-lengthpolynucleotide encoding the proteins of the invention.

A fragment of a polynucleotide encoding an AP2 transcription factordomain or an AP2 transcription factor polypeptide will encode at least15, 25, 30, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450, 500, 550, 600,650, 675, 700, 725, 750, 775, 800, 825 contiguous amino acids, or up tothe total number of amino acids present in a full-length AP2transcription factor domain or AP2 transcription factor protein (i.e.,SEQ ID NO: 2). Fragments of an AP2 transcription factor domain or an AP2transcription factor polynucleotide that are useful as hybridizationprobes, PCR primers or as suppression constructs generally need notencode a biologically active portion of an AP2 transcription factorprotein or an AP2 transcription factor domain.

A biologically active portion of a polypeptide comprising an AP2transcription factor domain, or an AP2 transcription factor protein canbe prepared by isolating a portion of an AP2 transcription factorpolynucleotide, expressing the encoded portion of the AP2 transcriptionfactor protein (e.g., by recombinant expression in vitro) and assessingthe activity of the encoded portion of the AP2 transcription factorprotein. Polynucleotides that are fragments of an AP2 transcriptionfactor nucleotide sequence or a polynucleotide sequence comprising anAP2 transcription factor domain comprise at least 16, 20, 50, 75, 100,150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450, 500, 550, 600, 650, 700, 800, 900,1,000, 1,100, 1,200, 1,300, 1,400, 1,500, 1,600, 1,700, 1,800, 1,900,2,000, 2,050, 2,100, 2,150, 2,200, 2,250, 2,300, 2,350, 2,400, 2,450,2,500 contiguous nucleotides or up to the number of nucleotides presentin a full-length AP2 transcription factor domain or in an AP2transcription factor polynucleotide (i.e., SEQ ID NOS: 1 and 3, 919 and1217 nucleotides, respectively).

“Variants” is intended to mean substantially similar sequences. Forpolynucleotides, a variant comprises a deletion and/or addition of oneor more nucleotides at one or more internal sites within the nativepolynucleotide and/or a substitution of one or more nucleotides at oneor more sites in the native polynucleotide. As used herein, a “native”polynucleotide or polypeptide comprises a naturally occurring nucleotidesequence or amino acid sequence, respectively. For polynucleotides,conservative variants include those sequences that, because of thedegeneracy of the genetic code, encode the amino acid sequence of one ofthe AP2 transcription factor polypeptides or of an AP2 transcriptionfactor domain. Naturally occurring allelic variants such as these can beidentified with the use of well-known molecular biology techniques, as,for example, with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and hybridizationtechniques as outlined below. Variant polynucleotides also includesynthetically derived polynucleotide, such as those generated, forexample, by using site-directed mutagenesis but which still encode apolypeptide comprising an AP2 transcription factor domain (or both) oran AP2 transcription factor polypeptide that is capable of regulatingtranscription or that is capable of reducing the level of expression(i.e., suppressing or silencing) of an AP2 transcription factorpolynucleotide. Generally, variants of a particular polynucleotide ofthe invention will have at least about 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%,70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99% ormore sequence identity to that particular polynucleotide as determinedby sequence alignment programs and parameters described elsewhereherein.

Variants of a particular polynucleotide of the invention (i.e., thereference polynucleotide) can also be evaluated by comparison of thepercent sequence identity between the polypeptide encoded by a variantpolynucleotide and the polypeptide encoded by the referencepolynucleotide. Thus, for example, an isolated polynucleotide thatencodes a polypeptide with a given percent sequence identity to thepolypeptide of SEQ ID NO. 2 or SEQ ID NO: 4 are disclosed. Percentsequence identity between any two polypeptides can be calculated usingsequence alignment programs and parameters described elsewhere herein.Where any given pair of polynucleotides of the invention is evaluated bycomparison of the percent sequence identity shared by the twopolypeptides they encode, the percent sequence identity between the twoencoded polypeptides is at least about 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%,70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99% ormore sequence identity.

“Variant” protein is intended to mean a protein derived from the nativeprotein by deletion or addition of one or more amino acids at one ormore internal sites in the native protein and/or substitution of one ormore amino acids at one or more sites in the native protein. Variantproteins encompassed by the present invention are biologically active,that is they continue to possess the desired biological activity of thenative protein, that is, regulate transcription as described herein.Such variants may result from, for example, genetic polymorphism or fromhuman manipulation. Biologically active variants of an AP2 transcriptionfactor protein of the invention of an AP2 transcription factor domainwill have at least about 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%,85%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99% or more sequenceidentity to the amino acid sequence for the AP2 transcription factorprotein or the consensus AP2 transcription factor domain as determinedby sequence alignment programs and parameters described elsewhereherein. A biologically active variant of an AP2 transcription factorprotein of the invention or of an AP2 transcription factor domain maydiffer from that protein by as few as 1-15 amino acid residues, as fewas 1-10, such as 6-10, as few as 5, as few as 4, 3, 2 or even 1 aminoacid residue.

The polynucleotides of the invention may be altered in various waysincluding amino acid substitutions, deletions, truncations andinsertions. Methods for such manipulations are generally known in theart. For example, amino acid sequence variants and fragments of the AP2transcription factor proteins or AP2 transcription factor domains can beprepared by mutations in the DNA. Methods for mutagenesis andpolynucleotide alterations are well known in the art. See, for example,Kunkel (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82:488-492; Kunkel, et al.,(1987) Methods in Enzymol. 154:367-382; U.S. Pat. No. 4,873,192; Walkerand Gaastra, eds. (1983) Techniques in Molecular Biology (MacMillanPublishing Company, New York) and the references cited therein. Guidanceas to appropriate amino acid substitutions that do not affect biologicalactivity of the protein of interest may be found in the model ofDayhoff, et al., (1978) Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure (Natl.Biomed. Res. Found., Washington, D.C.), herein incorporated byreference. Conservative substitutions, such as exchanging one amino acidwith another having similar properties, may be optimal.

Thus, the genes and polynucleotides of the invention include both thenaturally occurring sequences as well as mutant forms. Likewise, theproteins of the invention encompass both naturally occurring proteins aswell as variations and modified forms thereof. Such variants willcontinue to possess the desired activity (i.e., the ability to regulatetranscription or decrease the level of expression of a target AP2transcription factor sequence). In specific embodiments, the mutationsthat will be made in the DNA encoding the variant do not place thesequence out of reading frame and do not create complementary regionsthat could produce secondary mRNA structure. See, EP Patent ApplicationPublication Number 75,444.

The deletions, insertions and substitutions of the protein sequencesencompassed herein are not expected to produce radical changes in thecharacteristics of the protein. However, when it is difficult to predictthe exact effect of the substitution, deletion or insertion in advanceof doing so, one skilled in the art will appreciate that the effect willbe evaluated by routine screening assays. For example, the activity ofan AP2 transcription factor polypeptide can be evaluated by assaying forthe ability of the polypeptide to regulate transcription. Variousmethods can be used to assay for this activity, including, directlymonitoring the level of expression of a target gene at the nucleotide orpolypeptide level. Methods for such an analysis are known and include,for example, Northern blots, 51 protection assays, Western blots,enzymatic or colorimetric assays. In specific embodiments, determiningif a sequence has AP2 transcription factor activity can be assayed bymonitoring for an increase or decrease in the level or activity oftarget genes, including AG. For example, in specific embodiments, an AP2transcription factor sequence can modulate transcription of target genessuch as the floral homeotic gene AG, genes involved in auxin-regulatedgrowth and development, and the like. See, Sridhar, et al., (2004) Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:11494-11499, herein incorporated by reference.Alternatively, methods to assay for a modulation of transcriptionalactivity can include monitoring for an alteration in the phenotype ofthe plant. For example, as discussed in further detail elsewhere herein,modulating the level of an AP2 transcription factor polypeptide canresult in abnormal flower formation, root initiation and alteration ofyield. Methods to assay for these changes are discussed in furtherdetail elsewhere herein.

Variant polynucleotides and proteins also encompass sequences andproteins derived from a mutagenic and recombinogenic procedure such asDNA shuffling. With such a procedure, one or more different AP2transcription factor coding sequences can be manipulated to create a newAP2 transcription factor sequence or AP2 transcription factor domainpossessing the desired properties. In this manner, libraries ofrecombinant polynucleotides are generated from a population of relatedsequence polynucleotides comprising sequence regions that havesubstantial sequence identity and can be homologously recombined invitro or in vivo. For example, using this approach, sequence motifsencoding a domain of interest may be shuffled between the AP2transcription factor gene of the invention and other known AP2transcription factor genes to obtain a new gene coding for a proteinwith an improved property of interest, such as an increased K_(m) in thecase of an enzyme. Strategies for such DNA shuffling are known in theart. See, for example, Stemmer, (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA91:10747-10751; Stemmer, (1994) Nature 370:389-391; Crameri, et al.,(1997) Nature Biotech. 15:436-438; Moore, et al., (1997) J. Mol. Biol.272:336-347; Zhang, et al., (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA94:4504-4509; Crameri, et al., (1998) Nature 391:288-291 and U.S. Pat.Nos. 5,605,793 and 5,837,458.

The polynucleotides of the invention can be used to isolatecorresponding sequences from other organisms, particularly other plants,more particularly other monocots. In this manner, methods such as PCR,hybridization and the like can be used to identify such sequences basedon their sequence homology to the sequences set forth herein. Sequencesisolated based on their sequence identity to the entire AP2transcription factor sequences, or AP2 transcription factor domains ofthe invention, set forth herein or to variants and fragments thereof areencompassed by the present invention. Such sequences include sequencesthat are orthologs of the disclosed sequences. “Orthologs” is intendedto mean genes derived from a common ancestral gene and which are foundin different species as a result of speciation. Genes found in differentspecies are considered orthologs when their nucleotide sequences and/ortheir encoded protein sequences share at least 60%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%,90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99% or greater sequenceidentity. Functions of orthologs are often highly conserved amongspecies. Thus, isolated polynucleotides that can silence or suppress theexpression of an AP2 transcription factor sequence or a polynucleotidethat encodes for an AP2 transcription factor protein and which hybridizeunder stringent conditions to the AP2 transcription factor sequencesdisclosed herein, or to variants or fragments thereof, are encompassedby the present invention.

In a PCR approach, oligonucleotide primers can be designed for use inPCR reactions to amplify corresponding DNA sequences from cDNA orgenomic DNA extracted from any plant of interest. Methods for designingPCR primers and PCR cloning are generally known in the art and aredisclosed in Sambrook, et al., (1989) Molecular Cloning: A LaboratoryManual (2d ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, N.Y.).See also, Innis, et al., eds. (1990) PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methodsand Applications (Academic Press, New York); Innis and Gelfand, eds.(1995) PCR Strategies (Academic Press, New York); and Innis and Gelfand,eds. (1999) PCR Methods Manual (Academic Press, New York). Known methodsof PCR include, but are not limited to, methods using paired primers,nested primers, single specific primers, degenerate primers,gene-specific primers, vector-specific primers, partially-mismatchedprimers and the like.

In hybridization techniques, all or part of a known polynucleotide isused as a probe that selectively hybridizes to other correspondingpolynucleotides present in a population of cloned genomic DNA fragmentsor cDNA fragments (i.e., genomic or cDNA libraries) from a chosenorganism. The hybridization probes may be genomic DNA fragments, cDNAfragments, RNA fragments or other oligonucleotides and may be labeledwith a detectable group such as ³²P, or any other detectable marker.Thus, for example, probes for hybridization can be made by labelingsynthetic oligonucleotides based on the AP2 transcription factorpolynucleotides of the invention. Methods for preparation of probes forhybridization and for construction of cDNA and genomic libraries aregenerally known in the art and are disclosed in Sambrook, et al., (1989)Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (2d ed., Cold Spring HarborLaboratory Press, Plainview, N.Y.).

For example, the entire AP2 transcription factor polynucleotide or apolynucleotide encoding an AP2 transcription factor domain disclosedherein or one or more portions thereof, may be used as a probe capableof specifically hybridizing to corresponding AP2 transcription factorpolynucleotide and messenger RNAs. To achieve specific hybridizationunder a variety of conditions, such probes include sequences that areunique among AP2 transcription factor polynucleotide sequences and areoptimally at least about 10 nucleotides in length and most optimally atleast about 20 nucleotides in length. Such probes may be used to amplifycorresponding AP2 transcription factor polynucleotide from a chosenplant by PCR. This technique may be used to isolate additional codingsequences from a desired plant or as a diagnostic assay to determine thepresence of coding sequences in a plant. Hybridization techniquesinclude hybridization screening of plated DNA libraries (either plaquesor colonies; see, for example, Sambrook, et al., (1989) MolecularCloning: A Laboratory Manual (2d ed., Cold Spring Harbor LaboratoryPress, Plainview, N.Y.).

Hybridization of such sequences may be carried out under stringentconditions. By “stringent conditions” or “stringent hybridizationconditions” is intended conditions under which a probe will hybridize toits target sequence to a detectably greater degree than to othersequences (e.g., at least 2-fold over background). Stringent conditionsare sequence-dependent and will be different in different circumstances.By controlling the stringency of the hybridization and/or washingconditions, target sequences that are 100% complementary to the probecan be identified (homologous probing). Alternatively, stringencyconditions can be adjusted to allow some mismatching in sequences sothat lower degrees of similarity are detected (heterologous probing).Generally, a probe is less than about 1000 nucleotides in length,optimally less than 500 nucleotides in length.

Typically, stringent conditions will be those in which the saltconcentration is less than about 1.5 M Na ion, typically about 0.01 to1.0 M Na ion concentration (or other salts) at pH 7.0 to 8.3 and thetemperature is at least about 30° C. for short probes (e.g., 10 to 50nucleotides) and at least about 60° C. for long probes (e.g., greaterthan 50 nucleotides). Stringent conditions may also be achieved with theaddition of destabilizing agents such as formamide. Exemplary lowstringency conditions include hybridization with a buffer solution of 30to 35% formamide, 1 M NaCl, 1% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulphate) at 37° C.,and a wash in 1× to 2×SSC (20×SSC=3.0 M NaCl/0.3 M trisodium citrate) at50 to 55° C. Exemplary moderate stringency conditions includehybridization in 40 to 45% formamide, 1.0 M NaCl, 1% SDS at 37° C. and awash in 0.5× to 1×SSC at 55 to 60° C. Exemplary high stringencyconditions include hybridization in 50% formamide, 1 M NaCl, 1% SDS at37° C. and a wash in 0.1×SSC at 60 to 65° C. Optionally, wash buffersmay comprise about 0.1% to about 1% SDS. Duration of hybridization isgenerally less than about 24 hours, usually about 4 to about 12 hours.The duration of the wash time will be at least a length of timesufficient to reach equilibrium.

Specificity is typically the function of post-hybridization washes, thecritical factors being the ionic strength and temperature of the finalwash solution. For DNA-DNA hybrids, the T_(m) can be approximated fromthe equation of Meinkoth and Wahl, (1984) Anal. Biochem. 138:267-284:T_(m)=81.5° C.+16.6 (log M)+0.41 (% GC)−0.61 (% form)−500/L; where M isthe molarity of monovalent cations, % GC is the percentage of guanosineand cytosine nucleotides in the DNA, % form is the percentage offormamide in the hybridization solution, and L is the length of thehybrid in base pairs. The T_(m) is the temperature (under defined ionicstrength and pH) at which 50% of a complementary target sequencehybridizes to a perfectly matched probe. T_(m) is reduced by about 1° C.for each 1% of mismatching; thus, T_(m), hybridization, and/or washconditions can be adjusted to hybridize to sequences of the desiredidentity. For example, if sequences with ≧90% identity are sought, theT_(m) can be decreased 10° C. Generally, stringent conditions areselected to be about 5° C. lower than the thermal melting point (T_(m))for the specific sequence and its complement at a defined ionic strengthand pH. However, severely stringent conditions can utilize ahybridization and/or wash at 1, 2, 3 or 4° C. lower than the thermalmelting point (T_(m)); moderately stringent conditions can utilize ahybridization and/or wash at 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10° C. lower than the thermalmelting point (T_(m)); low stringency conditions can utilize ahybridization and/or wash at 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 or 20° C. lower than thethermal melting point (T_(m)). Using the equation, hybridization andwash compositions, and desired T_(m), those of ordinary skill willunderstand that variations in the stringency of hybridization and/orwash solutions are inherently described. If the desired degree ofmismatching results in a T_(m) of less than 45° C. (aqueous solution) or32° C. (formamide solution), it is optimal to increase the SSCconcentration so that a higher temperature can be used. An extensiveguide to the hybridization of nucleic acids is found in Tijssen, (1993)Laboratory Techniques in Biochemistry and MolecularBiology-Hybridization with Nucleic Acid Probes, Part I, Chapter 2(Elsevier, New York); and Ausubel, et al., eds. (1995) Current Protocolsin Molecular Biology, Chapter 2 (Greene Publishing andWiley-Interscience, New York). See, Sambrook, et al., (1989) MolecularCloning: A Laboratory Manual (2d ed., Cold Spring Harbor LaboratoryPress, Plainview, N.Y.).

The following terms are used to describe the sequence relationshipsbetween two or more polynucleotides or polypeptides: (a) “referencesequence”, (b) “comparison window”, (c) “sequence identity” and (d)“percentage of sequence identity.”

(a) As used herein, “reference sequence” is a defined sequence used as abasis for sequence comparison. A reference sequence may be a subset orthe entirety of a specified sequence; for example, as a segment of afull-length cDNA or gene sequence or the complete cDNA or gene sequence.

(b) As used herein, “comparison window” makes reference to a contiguousand specified segment of a polynucleotide sequence, wherein thepolynucleotide sequence in the comparison window may comprise additionsor deletions (i.e., gaps) compared to the reference sequence (which doesnot comprise additions or deletions) for optimal alignment of the twopolynucleotides. Generally, the comparison window is at least 20contiguous nucleotides in length, and optionally can be 30, 40, 50, 100or longer. Those of skill in the art understand that to avoid a highsimilarity to a reference sequence due to inclusion of gaps in thepolynucleotide sequence a gap penalty is typically introduced and issubtracted from the number of matches.

Methods of alignment of sequences for comparison are well known in theart. Thus, the determination of percent sequence identity between anytwo sequences can be accomplished using a mathematical algorithm.Non-limiting examples of such mathematical algorithms are the algorithmof Myers and Miller, (1988) CABIOS 4:11-17; the local alignmentalgorithm of Smith, et al., (1981) Adv. Appl. Math. 2:482; the globalalignment algorithm of Needleman and Wunsch, (1970) J. Mol. Biol.48:443-453; the search-for-local alignment method of Pearson and Lipman,(1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 85:2444-2448; the algorithm of Karlin andAltschul, (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 872264, modified as inKarlin and Altschul, (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:5873-5877.

Computer implementations of these mathematical algorithms can beutilized for comparison of sequences to determine sequence identity.Such implementations include, but are not limited to: CLUSTAL in thePC/Gene program (available from Intelligenetics, Mountain View, Calif.);the ALIGN program (Version 2.0) and GAP, BESTFIT, BLAST, FASTA, andTFASTA in the GCG Wisconsin Genetics Software Package®, Version 10(available from Accelrys Inc., 9685 Scranton Road, San Diego, Calif.,USA). Alignments using these programs can be performed using the defaultparameters. The CLUSTAL program is well described by Higgins, et al.,(1988) Gene 73:237-244 (1988); Higgins, et al., (1989) CABIOS 5:151-153;Corpet, et al., (1988) Nucleic Acids Res. 16:10881-90; Huang, et al.,(1992) CABIOS 8:155-65; and Pearson, et al., (1994) Meth. Mol. Biol.24:307-331. The ALIGN program is based on the algorithm of Myers andMiller, (1988) supra. A PAM120 weight residue table, a gap lengthpenalty of 12, and a gap penalty of 4 can be used with the ALIGN programwhen comparing amino acid sequences. The BLAST programs of Altschul, etal., (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 215:403 are based on the algorithm of Karlinand Altschul, (1990) supra. BLAST nucleotide searches can be performedwith the BLASTN program, score=100, wordlength=12, to obtain nucleotidesequences homologous to a nucleotide sequence encoding a protein of theinvention. BLAST protein searches can be performed with the BLASTXprogram, score=50, wordlength=3, to obtain amino acid sequenceshomologous to a protein or polypeptide of the invention. To obtaingapped alignments for comparison purposes, Gapped BLAST (in BLAST 2.0)can be utilized as described in Altschul, et al., (1997) Nucleic AcidsRes. 25:3389. Alternatively, PSI-BLAST (in BLAST 2.0) can be used toperform an iterated search that detects distant relationships betweenmolecules. See, Altschul, et al., (1997) supra. When utilizing BLAST,Gapped BLAST, PSI-BLAST, the default parameters of the respectiveprograms (e.g., BLASTN for nucleotide sequences, BLASTX for proteins)can be used. See, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Alignment may also be performedmanually by inspection.

Unless otherwise stated, sequence identity/similarity values providedherein refer to the value obtained using GAP Version 10 using thefollowing parameters: % identity and % similarity for a nucleotidesequence using GAP Weight of 50 and Length Weight of 3, and thenwsgapdna.cmp scoring matrix; % identity and % similarity for an aminoacid sequence using GAP Weight of 8 and Length Weight of 2, and theBLOSUM62 scoring matrix; or any equivalent program thereof. By“equivalent program” is intended any sequence comparison program that,for any two sequences in question, generates an alignment havingidentical nucleotide or amino acid residue matches and an identicalpercent sequence identity when compared to the corresponding alignmentgenerated by GAP Version 10.

GAP uses the algorithm of Needleman and Wunsch, (1970) J. Mol. Biol.48:443-453, to find the alignment of two complete sequences thatmaximizes the number of matches and minimizes the number of gaps. GAPconsiders all possible alignments and gap positions and creates thealignment with the largest number of matched bases and the fewest gaps.It allows for the provision of a gap creation penalty and a gapextension penalty in units of matched bases. GAP must make a profit ofgap creation penalty number of matches for each gap it inserts. If a gapextension penalty greater than zero is chosen, GAP must, in addition,make a profit for each gap inserted of the length of the gap times thegap extension penalty. Default gap creation penalty values and gapextension penalty values in Version 10 of the GCG Wisconsin GeneticsSoftware Package® for protein sequences are 8 and 2, respectively. Fornucleotide sequences the default gap creation penalty is 50 while thedefault gap extension penalty is 3. The gap creation and gap extensionpenalties can be expressed as an integer selected from the group ofintegers consisting of from 0 to 200. Thus, for example, the gapcreation and gap extension penalties can be 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,9, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65 or greater.

GAP presents one member of the family of best alignments. There may bemany members of this family, but no other member has a better quality.GAP displays four figures of merit for alignments: Quality, Ratio,Identity and Similarity. The Quality is the metric maximized in order toalign the sequences. Ratio is the quality divided by the number of basesin the shorter segment. Percent Identity is the percent of the symbolsthat actually match. Percent Similarity is the percent of the symbolsthat are similar. Symbols that are across from gaps are ignored. Asimilarity is scored when the scoring matrix value for a pair of symbolsis greater than or equal to 0.50, the similarity threshold. The scoringmatrix used in Version 10 of the GCG Wisconsin Genetics SoftwarePackage® is BLOSUM62 (see, Henikoff and Henikoff, (1989) Proc. Natl.Acad. Sci. USA 89:10915).

(c) As used herein, “sequence identity” or “identity” in the context oftwo polynucleotides or polypeptide sequences makes reference to theresidues in the two sequences that are the same when aligned for maximumcorrespondence over a specified comparison window. When percentage ofsequence identity is used in reference to proteins it is recognized thatresidue positions which are not identical often differ by conservativeamino acid substitutions, where amino acid residues are substituted forother amino acid residues with similar chemical properties (e.g., chargeor hydrophobicity) and therefore do not change the functional propertiesof the molecule. When sequences differ in conservative substitutions,the percent sequence identity may be adjusted upwards to correct for theconservative nature of the substitution. Sequences that differ by suchconservative substitutions are said to have “sequence similarity” or“similarity”. Means for making this adjustment are well known to thoseof skill in the art. Typically this involves scoring a conservativesubstitution as a partial rather than a full mismatch, therebyincreasing the percentage sequence identity. Thus, for example, where anidentical amino acid is given a score of 1 and a non-conservativesubstitution is given a score of zero, a conservative substitution isgiven a score between zero and 1. The scoring of conservativesubstitutions is calculated, e.g., as implemented in the program PC/GENE(Intelligenetics, Mountain View, Calif.).

(d) As used herein, “percentage of sequence identity” means the valuedetermined by comparing two optimally aligned sequences over acomparison window, wherein the portion of the polynucleotide sequence inthe comparison window may comprise additions or deletions (i.e., gaps)as compared to the reference sequence (which does not comprise additionsor deletions) for optimal alignment of the two sequences. The percentageis calculated by determining the number of positions at which theidentical nucleic acid base or amino acid residue occurs in bothsequences to yield the number of matched positions, dividing the numberof matched positions by the total number of positions in the window ofcomparison and multiplying the result by 100 to yield the percentage ofsequence identity.

B. Plants

In specific embodiments, the invention provides plants, plant cells andplant parts having altered levels (i.e., an increase or decrease) of anAP2 transcription factor sequence. In some embodiments, the plants andplant parts have stably incorporated into their genome at least oneheterologous polynucleotide encoding an AP2 transcription factorpolypeptide comprising the AP2 transcription factor domain as set forthin SEQ ID NO: 5, or a biologically active variant or fragment thereof.In one embodiment, the polynucleotide encoding the AP2 transcriptionfactor polypeptide is set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1 or a biologically activevariant or fragment thereof.

In yet other embodiments, plants and plant parts are provided in whichthe heterologous polynucleotide stably integrated into the genome of theplant or plant part comprises a polynucleotide which when expressed in aplant increases the level of an AP2 transcription factor polypeptidecomprising an AP2 transcription factor domain, an AP2 transcriptionfactor domain or an active variant or fragment thereof. Sequences thatcan be used to increase expression of an AP2 transcription factorpolypeptide include, but are not limited to, the sequence set forth inSEQ ID NO: 1 or variants or fragments thereof.

As discussed in further detail elsewhere herein, such plants, plantcells, plant parts and seeds can have an altered phenotype including,for example, altered flower organ development, leaf formation,phototropism, apical dominance, fruit development, root initiation andimproved yield.

As used herein, the term plant includes plant cells, plant protoplasts,plant cell tissue cultures from which plants can be regenerated, plantcalli, plant clumps and plant cells that are intact in plants or partsof plants such as embryos, pollen, ovules, seeds, leaves, flowers,branches, fruit, kernels, ears, cobs, husks, stalks, roots, root tips,anthers and the like. Grain is intended to mean the mature seed producedby commercial growers for purposes other than growing or reproducing thespecies. Progeny, variants and mutants of the regenerated plants arealso included within the scope of the invention, provided that theseparts comprise the introduced or heterologous polynucleotides disclosedherein.

The present invention may be used for transformation of any plantspecies, including, but not limited to, monocots and dicots. Examples ofplant species of interest include, but are not limited to, corn (Zeamays), Brassica sp. (e.g., B. napus, B. rapa, B. juncea), particularlythose Brassica species useful as sources of seed oil, alfalfa (Medicagosativa), rice (Oryza sativa), rye (Secale cereale), sorghum (Sorghumbicolor, Sorghum vulgare), millet (e.g., pearl millet (Pennisetumglaucum), proso millet (Panicum miliaceum), foxtail millet (Setariaitalica), finger millet (Eleusine coracana)), sunflower (Helianthusannuus), safflower (Carthamus tinctorius), wheat (Triticum aestivum),soybean (Glycine max), tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), potato (Solanumtuberosum), peanuts (Arachis hypogaea), cotton (Gossypium barbadense,Gossypium hirsutum), sweet potato (Ipomoea batatus), cassaya (Manihotesculenta), coffee (Coffea spp.), coconut (Cocos nucifera), pineapple(Ananas comosus), citrus trees (Citrus spp.), cocoa (Theobroma cacao),tea (Camellia sinensis), banana (Musa spp.), avocado (Persea americana),fig (Ficus casica), guava (Psidium guajava), mango (Mangifera indica),olive (Olea europaea), papaya (Carica papaya), cashew (Anacardiumoccidentale), macadamia (Macadamia integrifolia), almond (Prunusamygdalus), sugar beets (Beta vulgaris), sugarcane (Saccharum spp.),oats, barley, vegetables, ornamentals and conifers.

Vegetables include tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum), lettuce (e.g.,Lactuca sativa), green beans (Phaseolus vulgaris), lima beans (Phaseoluslimensis), peas (Lathyrus spp.) and members of the genus Cucumis such ascucumber (C. sativus), cantaloupe (C. cantalupensis) and musk melon (C.melo). Ornamentals include azalea (Rhododendron spp.), hydrangea(Macrophylla hydrangea), hibiscus (Hibiscus rosasanensis), roses (Rosaspp.), tulips (Tulipa spp.), daffodils (Narcissus spp.), petunias(Petunia hybrida), carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus), poinsettia(Euphorbia pulcherrima) and chrysanthemum.

Conifers that may be employed in practicing the present inventioninclude, for example, pines such as loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), slashpine (Pinus effiotii), ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa), lodgepole pine(Pinus contorta) and Monterey pine (Pinus radiata); Douglas-fir(Pseudotsuga menziesii); Western hemlock (Tsuga canadensis); Sitkaspruce (Picea glauca); redwood (Sequoia sempervirens); true firs such assilver fir (Abies amabilis) and balsam fir (Abies balsamea) and cedarssuch as Western red cedar (Thuja plicata) and Alaska yellow-cedar(Chamaecyparis nootkatensis). In specific embodiments, plants of thepresent invention are crop plants (for example, corn, alfalfa,sunflower, Brassica, soybean, cotton, safflower, peanut, sorghum, wheat,millet, tobacco, etc.). In other embodiments, corn and soybean plantsare optimal and in yet other embodiments corn plants are optimal.

Other plants of interest include grain plants that provide seeds ofinterest, oil-seed plants, and leguminous plants. Seeds of interestinclude grain seeds, such as corn, wheat, barley, rice, sorghum, rye,etc. Oil-seed plants include cotton, soybean, safflower, sunflower,Brassica, maize, alfalfa, palm, coconut, etc. Leguminous plants includebeans and peas. Beans include guar, locust bean, fenugreek, soybean,garden beans, cowpea, mungbean, lima bean, fava bean, lentils, chickpea,etc.

A “subject plant or plant cell” is one in which an alteration, such astransformation or introduction of a polypeptide, has occurred or is aplant or plant cell which is descended from a plant or cell so alteredand which comprises the alteration. A “control” or “control plant” or“control plant cell” provides a reference point for measuring changes inphenotype of the subject plant or plant cell.

A control plant or plant cell may comprise, for example: (a) a wild-typeplant or cell, i.e., of the same genotype as the starting material forthe alteration which resulted in the subject plant or cell; (b) a plantor plant cell of the same genotype as the starting material but whichhas been transformed with a null construct (i.e., with a construct whichhas no known effect on the trait of interest, such as a constructcomprising a marker gene); (c) a plant or plant cell which is anon-transformed segregant among progeny of a subject plant or plantcell; (d) a plant or plant cell genetically identical to the subjectplant or plant cell but which is not exposed to conditions or stimulithat would induce expression of the gene of interest or (e) the subjectplant or plant cell itself, under conditions in which the gene ofinterest is not expressed.

C. Polynucleotide Constructs

The use of the term “polynucleotide” is not intended to limit thepresent invention to polynucleotides comprising DNA. Those of ordinaryskill in the art will recognize that polynucleotides, can compriseribonucleotides and combinations of ribonucleotides anddeoxyribonucleotides. Such deoxyribonucleotides and ribonucleotidesinclude both naturally occurring molecules and synthetic analogues. Thepolynucleotides of the invention also encompass all forms of sequencesincluding, but not limited to, single-stranded forms, double-strandedforms, hairpins, stem-and-loop structures and the like.

The various polynucleotides employed in the methods and compositions ofthe invention can be provided in expression cassettes for expression inthe plant of interest. The cassette will include 5′ and 3′ regulatorysequences operably linked to a polynucleotide of the invention.“Operably linked” is intended to mean a functional linkage between twoor more elements. For example, an operable linkage between apolynucleotide of interest and a regulatory sequence (i.e., a promoter)is functional link that allows for expression of the polynucleotide ofinterest. Operably linked elements may be contiguous or non-contiguous.When used to refer to the joining of two protein coding regions, byoperably linked is intended that the coding regions are in the samereading frame. The cassette may additionally contain at least oneadditional gene to be cotransformed into the organism. Alternatively,the additional gene(s) can be provided on multiple expression cassettes.Such an expression cassette is provided with a plurality of restrictionsites and/or recombination sites for insertion of the AP2 transcriptionfactor polynucleotide to be under the transcriptional regulation of theregulatory regions. The expression cassette may additionally containselectable marker genes.

The expression cassette can include in the 5′-3′ direction oftranscription, a transcriptional and translational initiation region(i.e., a promoter), an AP2 transcription factor polynucleotide and atranscriptional and translational termination region (i.e., terminationregion) functional in plants. The regulatory regions (i.e., promoters,transcriptional regulatory regions, and translational terminationregions) and/or the AP2 transcription factor polynucleotide may benative/analogous to the host cell or to each other. Alternatively, theregulatory regions and/or the AP2 transcription factor polynucleotidesmay be heterologous to the host cell or to each other. As used herein,“heterologous” in reference to a sequence is a sequence that originatesfrom a foreign species, or, if from the same species, is substantiallymodified from its native form in composition and/or genomic locus bydeliberate human intervention. For example, a promoter operably linkedto a heterologous polynucleotide is from a species different from thespecies from which the polynucleotide was derived or, if from thesame/analogous species, one or both are substantially modified fromtheir original form and/or genomic locus or the promoter is not thenative promoter for the operably linked polynucleotide. As used herein,a chimeric gene comprises a coding sequence operably linked to atranscription initiation region that is heterologous to the codingsequence.

While it may be optimal to express the sequences using heterologouspromoters, the native promoter sequences may be used. Such constructscan change expression levels of an AP2 transcription factor transcriptor protein in the plant or plant cell. Thus, the phenotype of the plantor plant cell can be altered.

The termination region may be native with the transcriptional initiationregion, may be native with the operably linked AP2 transcription factorpolynucleotide of interest, may be native with the plant host, or may bederived from another source (i.e., foreign or heterologous) to thepromoter, the AP2 transcription factor polynucleotide of interest, theplant host, or any combination thereof. Convenient termination regionsare available from the Ti-plasmid of A. tumefaciens, such as theoctopine synthase and nopaline synthase termination regions. See also,Guerineau, et al., (1991) Mol. Gen. Genet. 262:141-144; Proudfoot,(1991) Cell 64:671-674; Sanfacon, et al., (1991) Genes Dev. 5:141-149;Mogen, et al., (1990) Plant Cell 2:1261-1272; Munroe, et al., (1990)Gene 91:151-158; Ballas, et al., (1989) Nucleic Acids Res. 17:7891-7903and Joshi, et al., (1987) Nucleic Acids Res. 15:9627-9639.

Where appropriate, the polynucleotides may be optimized for increasedexpression in the transformed plant. That is, the polynucleotides can besynthesized using plant-preferred codons for improved expression. See,for example, Campbell and Gowri, (1990) Plant Physiol. 92:1-11 for adiscussion of host-preferred codon usage. Methods are available in theart for synthesizing plant-preferred genes. See, for example, U.S. Pat.Nos. 5,380,831 and 5,436,391 and Murray, et al., (1989) Nucleic AcidsRes. 17:477-498, herein incorporated by reference.

Additional sequence modifications are known to enhance gene expressionin a cellular host. These include elimination of sequences encodingspurious polyadenylation signals, exon-intron splice site signals,transposon repeats and other such well-characterized sequences that maybe deleterious to gene expression. The G-C content of the sequence maybe adjusted to levels average for a given cellular host, as calculatedby reference to known genes expressed in the host cell. When possible,the sequence is modified to avoid predicted hairpin secondary mRNAstructures.

The expression cassettes may additionally contain 5′ leader sequences.Such leader sequences can act to enhance translation. Translationleaders are known in the art and include: picornavirus leaders, forexample, EMCV leader (Encephalomyocarditis 5′ noncoding region)(Elroy-Stein, et al., (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:6126-6130);potyvirus leaders, for example, TEV leader (Tobacco Etch Virus) (Gallie,et al., (1995) Gene 165(2):233-238), MDMV leader (Maize Dwarf MosaicVirus) (Virology 154:9-20), and human immunoglobulin heavy-chain bindingprotein (BiP) (Macejak, et al., (1991) Nature 353:90-94); untranslatedleader from the coat protein mRNA of alfalfa mosaic virus (AMV RNA 4)(Jobling, et al., (1987) Nature 325:622-625); tobacco mosaic virusleader (TMV) (Gallie, et al., (1989) in Molecular Biology of RNA, ed.Cech (Liss, New York), pp. 237-256); and maize chlorotic mottle virusleader (MCMV) (Lommel, et al., (1991) Virology 81:382-385). See also,Della-Cioppa, et al., (1987) Plant Physiol. 84:965-968.

In preparing the expression cassette, the various DNA fragments may bemanipulated, so as to provide for the DNA sequences in the properorientation and, as appropriate, in the proper reading frame. Towardthis end, adapters or linkers may be employed to join the DNA fragmentsor other manipulations may be involved to provide for convenientrestriction sites, removal of superfluous DNA, removal of restrictionsites or the like. For this purpose, in vitro mutagenesis, primerrepair, restriction, annealing, resubstitutions, e.g., transitions andtransversions, may be involved.

A number of promoters can be used in the practice of the invention,including the native promoter of the polynucleotide sequence ofinterest. The promoters can be selected based on the desired outcome.The nucleic acids can be combined with constitutive, tissue-preferred orother promoters for expression in plants.

Such constitutive promoters include, for example, the core promoter ofthe Rsyn7 promoter and other constitutive promoters disclosed in WO99/43838 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,072,050; the core CaMV 35S promoter (Odell,et al., (1985) Nature 313:810-812); rice actin (McElroy, et al., (1990)Plant Cell 2:163-171); ubiquitin (Christensen, et al., (1989) Plant Mol.Biol. 12:619-632 and Christensen, et al., (1992) Plant Mol. Biol.18:675-689); pEMU (Last, et al., (1991) Theor. Appl. Genet. 81:581-588);MAS (Velten, et al., (1984) EMBO J. 3:2723-2730); ALS promoter (U.S.Pat. No. 5,659,026), GOS2 promoter (dePater, et al., (1992) Plant J.2:837-44) and the like. Other constitutive promoters include, forexample, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,608,149; 5,608,144; 5,604,121; 5,569,597;5,466,785; 5,399,680; 5,268,463; 5,608,142 and 6,177,611.

The expression cassette can also comprise a selectable marker gene forthe selection of transformed cells. Selectable marker genes are utilizedfor the selection of transformed cells or tissues. Marker genes includegenes encoding antibiotic resistance, such as those encoding neomycinphosphotransferase II (NEO) and hygromycin phosphotransferase (HPT), aswell as genes conferring resistance to herbicidal compounds, such asglufosinate ammonium, bromoxynil, imidazolinones, and2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetate (2,4-D). Additional selectable markersinclude phenotypic markers such as β-galactosidase and fluorescentproteins such as green fluorescent protein (GFP) (Su, et al., (2004)Biotechnol Bioeng 85:610-9 and Fetter, et al., (2004) Plant Cell16:215-28), cyan florescent protein (CYP) (Bolte, et al., (2004) J. CellScience 117:943-54 and Kato, et al., (2002) Plant Physiol 129:913-42)and yellow florescent protein (PhiYFP™ from Evrogen, see, Bolte, et al.,(2004) J. Cell Science 117:943-54). For additional selectable markers,see generally, Yarranton, (1992) Curr. Opin. Biotech. 3:506-511;Christopherson, et al., (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:6314-6318;Yao, et al., (1992) Cell 71:63-72; Reznikoff, (1992) Mol. Microbiol.6:2419-2422; Barkley, et al., (1980) in The Operon, pp. 177-220; Hu, etal., (1987) Cell 48:555-566; Brown, et al., (1987) Cell 49:603-612;Figge, et al., (1988) Cell 52:713-722; Deuschle, et al., (1989) Proc.Natl. Acad. Aci. USA 86:5400-5404; Fuerst, et al., (1989) Proc. Natl.Acad. Sci. USA 86:2549-2553; Deuschle, et al., (1990) Science248:480-483; Gossen, (1993) Ph.D. Thesis, University of Heidelberg;Reines, et al., (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:1917-1921; Labow,et al., (1990) Mol. Cell. Biol. 10:3343-3356; Zambretti, et al., (1992)Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:3952-3956; Baim, et al., (1991) Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:5072-5076; Wyborski, et al., (1991) NucleicAcids Res. 19:4647-4653; Hillenand-Wissman, (1989) Topics Mol. Struc.Biol. 10:143-162; Degenkolb, et al., (1991) Antimicrob. AgentsChemother. 35:1591-1595; Kleinschnidt, et al., (1988) Biochemistry27:1094-1104; Bonin, (1993) Ph.D. Thesis, University of Heidelberg;Gossen, et al., (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:5547-5551; Oliva,et al., (1992) Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 36:913-919; Hlavka, et al.,(1985) Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, Vol. 78 (Springer-Verlag,Berlin); Gill, et al., (1988) Nature 334:721-724. Such disclosures areherein incorporated by reference. The above list of selectable markergenes is not meant to be limiting. Any selectable marker gene can beused in the present invention.

In certain embodiments the polynucleotides of the present invention canbe stacked with any combination of polynucleotide sequences of interestin order to create plants with a desired trait. A trait, as used herein,refers to the phenotype derived from a particular sequence or groups ofsequences. The combinations generated can also include multiple copiesof any one of the polynucleotides of interest. The polynucleotides ofthe present invention can also be stacked with traits desirable fordisease or herbicide resistance (e.g., fumonisin detoxification genes(U.S. Pat. No. 5,792,931); avirulence and disease resistance genes(Jones, et al., (1994) Science 266:789; Martin, et al., (1993) Science262:1432; Mindrinos, et al., (1994) Cell 78:1089); acetolactate synthase(ALS) mutants that lead to herbicide resistance such as the S4 and/orHra mutations; inhibitors of glutamine synthase such as phosphinothricinor basta (e.g., bar gene); and glyphosate resistance (EPSPS gene)) andtraits desirable for processing or process products such as high oil(e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,232,529); modified oils (e.g., fatty aciddesaturase genes (U.S. Pat. No. 5,952,544; WO 1994/11516)); modifiedstarches (e.g., ADPG pyrophosphorylases (AGPase), starch synthases (SS),starch branching enzymes (SBE), and starch debranching enzymes (SDBE))and polymers or bioplastics (e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,602,321;beta-ketothiolase, polyhydroxybutyrate synthase, and acetoacetyl-CoAreductase (Schubert, et al., (1988) J. Bacteriol. 170:5837-5847)facilitate expression of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs)), the disclosuresof which are herein incorporated by reference. One could also combinethe polynucleotides of the present invention with polynucleotidesproviding agronomic traits such as male sterility (e.g., see, U.S. Pat.No. 5,583,210), stalk strength, flowering time or transformationtechnology traits such as cell cycle regulation or gene targeting (e.g.,WO 1999/61619, WO 2000/17364, and WO 1999/25821), the disclosures ofwhich are herein incorporated by reference.

These stacked combinations can be created by any method including, butnot limited to, cross-breeding plants by any conventional or TopCrossmethodology or genetic transformation. If the sequences are stacked bygenetically transforming the plants, the polynucleotide sequences ofinterest can be combined at any time and in any order. For example, atransgenic plant comprising one or more desired traits can be used asthe target to introduce further traits by subsequent transformation. Thetraits can be introduced simultaneously in a co-transformation protocolwith the polynucleotides of interest provided by any combination oftransformation cassettes. For example, if two sequences will beintroduced, the two sequences can be contained in separatetransformation cassettes (trans) or contained on the same transformationcassette (cis). Expression of the sequences can be driven by the samepromoter or by different promoters. In certain cases, it may bedesirable to introduce a transformation cassette that will suppress theexpression of the polynucleotide of interest. This may be combined withany combination of other suppression cassettes or overexpressioncassettes to generate the desired combination of traits in the plant. Itis further recognized that polynucleotide sequences can be stacked at adesired genomic location using a site-specific recombination system.See, for example, WO 1999/25821, WO 1999/25854, WO 1999/25840, WO1999/25855 and WO 1999/25853, all of which are herein incorporated byreference.

D. Method of Introducing

The methods of the invention involve introducing a polypeptide orpolynucleotide into a plant. “Introducing” is intended to meanpresenting to the plant the polynucleotide or polypeptide in such amanner that the sequence gains access to the interior of a cell of theplant. The methods of the invention do not depend on a particular methodfor introducing a sequence into a plant, only that the polynucleotide orpolypeptides gains access to the interior of at least one cell of theplant. Methods for introducing polynucleotide or polypeptides intoplants are known in the art including, but not limited to, stabletransformation methods, transient transformation methods andvirus-mediated methods.

“Stable transformation” is intended to mean that the nucleotideconstruct introduced into a plant integrates into the genome of theplant and is capable of being inherited by the progeny thereof.“Transient transformation” is intended to mean that a polynucleotide isintroduced into the plant and does not integrate into the genome of theplant or a polypeptide is introduced into a plant.

Transformation protocols as well as protocols for introducingpolypeptides or polynucleotide sequences into plants may vary dependingon the type of plant or plant cell, i.e., monocot or dicot, targeted fortransformation. Suitable methods of introducing polypeptides andpolynucleotides into plant cells include microinjection (Crossway, etal., (1986) Biotechniques 4:320-334), electroporation (Riggs, et al.,(1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:5602-5606, Agrobacterium-mediatedtransformation (U.S. Pat. No. 5,563,055 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,981,840),direct gene transfer (Paszkowski, et al., (1984) EMBO J. 3:2717-2722)and ballistic particle acceleration (see, for example, U.S. Pat. No.4,945,050; U.S. Pat. No. 5,879,918; U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,886,244 and5,932,782; Tomes, et al., (1995) in Plant Cell, Tissue, and OrganCulture: Fundamental Methods, ed. Gamborg and Phillips,(Springer-Verlag, Berlin); McCabe, et al., (1988) Biotechnology6:923-926) and Lec1 transformation (WO 2000/28058). Also see,Weissinger, et al., (1988) Ann. Rev. Genet. 22:421-477; Sanford, et al.,(1987) Particulate Science and Technology 5:27-37 (onion); Christou, etal., (1988) Plant Physiol. 87:671-674 (soybean); McCabe, et al., (1988)Bio/Technology 6:923-926 (soybean); Finer and McMullen, (1991) In VitroCell Dev. Biol. 27P:175-182 (soybean); Singh, et al., (1998) Theor.Appl. Genet. 96:319-324 (soybean); Datta, et al., (1990) Biotechnology8:736-740 (rice); Klein, et al., (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA85:4305-4309 (maize); Klein, et al., (1988) Biotechnology 6:559-563(maize); U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,240,855; 5,322,783 and 5,324,646; Klein, etal., (1988) Plant Physiol. 91:440-444 (maize); Fromm, et al., (1990)Biotechnology 8:833-839 (maize); Hooykaas-Van Slogteren, et al., (1984)Nature (London) 311:763-764; U.S. Pat. No. 5,736,369 (cereals);Bytebier, et al., (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:5345-5349(Liliaceae); De Wet, et al., (1985) in The Experimental Manipulation ofOvule Tissues, ed. Chapman, et al., (Longman, New York), pp. 197-209(pollen); Kaeppler, et al., (1990) Plant Cell Reports 9:415-418 andKaeppler, et al., (1992) Theor. Appl. Genet. 84:560-566(whisker-mediated transformation); D'Halluin, et al., (1992) Plant Cell4:1495-1505 (electroporation); Li, et al., (1993) Plant Cell Reports12:250-255 and Christou and Ford, (1995) Annals of Botany 75:407-413(rice); Osjoda, et al., (1996) Nature Biotechnology 14:745-750 (maizevia Agrobacterium tumefaciens), all of which are herein incorporated byreference.

In specific embodiments, the AP2 transcription factor sequences orvariants and fragments thereof can be provided to a plant using avariety of transient transformation methods. Such transienttransformation methods include, but are not limited to, the introductionof the AP2 transcription factor protein or variants and fragmentsthereof directly into the plant or the introduction of the AP2transcription factor transcript into the plant. Such methods include,for example, microinjection or particle bombardment. See, for example,Crossway, et al., (1986) Mol Gen. Genet. 202:179-185; Nomura, et al.,(1986) Plant Sci. 44:53-58; Hepler, et al., (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad.Sci. 91:2176-2180 and Hush, et al., (1994) The Journal of Cell Science107:775-784, all of which are herein incorporated by reference.Alternatively, the AP2 transcription factor polynucleotide can betransiently transformed into the plant using techniques known in theart. Such techniques include viral vector system and the precipitationof the polynucleotide in a manner that precludes subsequent release ofthe DNA. Thus, the transcription from the particle-bound DNA can occur,but the frequency with which it is released to become integrated intothe genome is greatly reduced. Such methods include the use particlescoated with polyethylamine (PEI; Sigma #P3143).

In other embodiments, the polynucleotide of the invention may beintroduced into plants by contacting plants with a virus or viralnucleic acids. Generally, such methods involve incorporating anucleotide construct of the invention within a viral DNA or RNAmolecule. It is recognized that the an AP2 transcription factor sequenceor a variant or fragment thereof may be initially synthesized as part ofa viral polyprotein, which later may be processed by proteolysis in vivoor in vitro to produce the desired recombinant protein. Further, it isrecognized that promoters of the invention also encompass promotersutilized for transcription by viral RNA polymerases. Methods forintroducing polynucleotides into plants and expressing a protein encodedtherein, involving viral DNA or RNA molecules, are known in the art.See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,889,191, 5,889,190, 5,866,785,5,589,367, 5,316,931 and Porta, et al., (1996) Molecular Biotechnology5:209-221, herein incorporated by reference.

Methods are known in the art for the targeted insertion of apolynucleotide at a specific location in the plant genome. In oneembodiment, the insertion of the polynucleotide at a desired genomiclocation is achieved using a site-specific recombination system. See,for example, WO 1999/25821, WO 1999/25854, WO 1999/25840, WO 1999/25855and WO 1999/25853, all of which are herein incorporated by reference.Briefly, the polynucleotide of the invention can be contained intransfer cassette flanked by two non-recombinogenic recombination sites.The transfer cassette is introduced into a plant having stablyincorporated into its genome a target site which is flanked by twonon-recombinogenic recombination sites that correspond to the sites ofthe transfer cassette. An appropriate recombinase is provided and thetransfer cassette is integrated at the target site. The polynucleotideof interest is thereby integrated at a specific chromosomal position inthe plant genome.

The cells that have been transformed may be grown into plants inaccordance with conventional ways. See, for example, McCormick, et al.,(1986) Plant Cell Reports 5:81-84. These plants may then be grown, andeither pollinated with the same transformed strain or different strains,and the resulting progeny having constitutive expression of the desiredphenotypic characteristic identified. Two or more generations may begrown to ensure that expression of the desired phenotypic characteristicis stably maintained and inherited and then seeds harvested to ensureexpression of the desired phenotypic characteristic has been achieved.In this manner, the present invention provides transformed seed (alsoreferred to as “transgenic seed”) having a polynucleotide of theinvention, for example, an expression cassette of the invention, stablyincorporated into their genome.

III. Methods of Use

A. Methods for Modulating Expression of at Least One AP2 TranscriptionFactor Sequence or a Variant or Fragment Therefore in a Plant or PlantPart

A “modulated level” or “modulating level” of a polypeptide in thecontext of the methods of the present invention refers to any increaseor decrease in the expression, concentration or activity of a geneproduct, including any relative increment in expression, concentrationor activity. Any method or composition that modulates expression of atarget gene product, either at the level of transcription or translationor modulates the activity of the target gene product can be used toachieve modulated expression, concentration, activity of the target geneproduct. In general, the level is increased or decreased by at least 1%,5%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90% or greater relative toan appropriate control plant, plant part, or cell. Modulation in thepresent invention may occur during and/or subsequent to growth of theplant to the desired stage of development. In specific embodiments, thepolypeptides of the present invention are modulated in monocots,particularly grain plants such as rice, wheat, maize and the like.

The expression level of a polypeptide having an AP2 transcription factordomain or a biologically active variant or fragment thereof may bemeasured directly, for example, by assaying for the level of the AP2transcription factor polypeptide in the plant or indirectly, forexample, by measuring the level of the polynucleotide encoding theprotein or by measuring the activity of the AP2 transcription factorpolypeptide in the plant. Methods for determining the activity of theAP2 transcription factor polypeptide are described elsewhere herein.

In specific embodiments, the polypeptide or the polynucleotide of theinvention is introduced into the plant cell. Subsequently, a plant cellhaving the introduced sequence of the invention is selected usingmethods known to those of skill in the art such as, but not limited to,Southern blot analysis, DNA sequencing, PCR analysis, or phenotypicanalysis. A plant or plant part altered or modified by the foregoingembodiments is grown under plant forming conditions for a timesufficient to modulate the concentration and/or activity of polypeptidesof the present invention in the plant. Plant forming conditions are wellknown in the art and discussed briefly elsewhere herein.

It is also recognized that the level and/or activity of the polypeptidemay be modulated by employing a polynucleotide that is not capable ofdirecting, in a transformed plant, the expression of a protein or anRNA. For example, the polynucleotides of the invention may be used todesign polynucleotide constructs that can be employed in methods foraltering or mutating a genomic nucleotide sequence in an organism. Suchpolynucleotide constructs include, but are not limited to, RNA:DNAvectors, RNA:DNA mutational vectors, RNA:DNA repair vectors,mixed-duplex oligonucleotides, self-complementary RNA:DNAoligonucleotides and recombinogenic oligonucleobases. Such nucleotideconstructs and methods of use are known in the art. See, U.S. Pat. Nos.5,565,350; 5,731,181; 5,756,325; 5,760,012; 5,795,972 and 5,871,984, allof which are herein incorporated by reference. See also, WO 1998/49350,WO 1999/07865, WO 1999/25821 and Beetham, et al., (1999) Proc. Natl.Acad. Sci. USA 96:8774-8778, herein incorporated by reference.

It is therefore recognized that methods of the present invention do notdepend on the incorporation of the entire polynucleotide into thegenome, only that the plant or cell thereof is altered as a result ofthe introduction of the polynucleotide into a cell. In one embodiment ofthe invention, the genome may be altered following the introduction ofthe polynucleotide into a cell. For example, the polynucleotide, or anypart thereof, may incorporate into the genome of the plant. Alterationsto the genome of the present invention include, but are not limited to,additions, deletions and substitutions of nucleotides into the genome.While the methods of the present invention do not depend on additions,deletions, and substitutions of any particular number of nucleotides, itis recognized that such additions, deletions, or substitutions comprisesat least one nucleotide.

In one embodiment, the activity and/or level of an AP2 transcriptionfactor polypeptide is increased. An increase in the level and/oractivity of the AP2 transcription factor polypeptide can be achieved byproviding to the plant an AP2 transcription factor polypeptide or abiologically active variant or fragment thereof. As discussed elsewhereherein, many methods are known in the art for providing a polypeptide toa plant including, but not limited to, direct introduction of the AP2transcription factor polypeptide into the plant or introducing into theplant (transiently or stably) a polynucleotide construct encoding apolypeptide having AP2 transcription factor activity. It is alsorecognized that the methods of the invention may employ a polynucleotidethat is not capable of directing in the transformed plant the expressionof a protein or an RNA. Thus, the level and/or activity of an AP2transcription factor polypeptide may be increased by altering the geneencoding the AP2 transcription factor polypeptide or its promoter. See,e.g., Kmiec, U.S. Pat. No. 5,565,350; Zarling, et al., PCT/US93/03868.Therefore, mutagenized plants that carry mutations in AP2 transcriptionfactor genes, where the mutations increase expression of the AP2transcription factor gene or increase the activity of the encoded AP2transcription factor polypeptide, are provided.

In other embodiments, the activity and/or level of the AP2 transcriptionfactor polypeptide of the invention is reduced or eliminated byintroducing into a plant a polynucleotide that inhibits the level oractivity of a polypeptide. The polynucleotide may inhibit the expressionof AP2 transcription factor gene directly, by preventing translation ofthe AP2 transcription factor messenger RNA, or indirectly, by encoding apolypeptide that inhibits the transcription or translation of an AP2transcription factor gene encoding an AP2 transcription factor protein.Methods for inhibiting or eliminating the expression of a gene in aplant are well known in the art, and any such method may be used in thepresent invention to inhibit the expression of at least one AP2transcription factor sequence in a plant. In other embodiments of theinvention, the activity of an AP2 transcription factor polypeptide isreduced or eliminated by transforming a plant cell with a sequenceencoding a polypeptide that inhibits the activity of the AP2transcription factor polypeptide. In other embodiments, the activity ofan AP2 transcription factor polypeptide may be reduced or eliminated bydisrupting the gene encoding the AP2 transcription factor polypeptide.The invention encompasses mutagenized plants that carry mutations in AP2transcription factor genes, where the mutations reduce expression of theAP2 transcription factor gene or inhibit the AP2 transcription factoractivity of the encoded AP2 transcription factor polypeptide.

Reduction of the activity of specific genes (also known as genesilencing or gene suppression) is desirable for several aspects ofgenetic engineering in plants. Many techniques for gene silencing arewell known to one of skill in the art, including, but not limited to,antisense technology (see, e.g., Sheehy, et al., (1988) Proc. Natl.Acad. Sci. USA 85:8805-8809 and U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,107,065; 5,453,566 and5,759,829); cosuppression (e.g., Taylor, (1997) Plant Cell 9:1245;Jorgensen, (1990) Trends Biotech. 8(12):340-344; Flavell, (1994) Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:3490-3496; Finnegan, et al., (1994)Bio/Technology 12:883-888; and Neuhuber, et al., (1994) Mol. Gen. Genet.244:230-241); RNA interference (Napoli, et al., (1990) Plant Cell2:279-289; U.S. Pat. No. 5,034,323; Sharp, (1999) Genes Dev. 13:139-141;Zamore, et al., (2000) Cell 101:25-33 and Montgomery, et al., (1998)Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:15502-15507), virus-induced gene silencing(Burton, et al., (2000) Plant Cell 12:691-705; and Baulcombe, (1999)Curr. Op. Plant Bio. 2:109-113); target-RNA-specific ribozymes(Haseloff, et al., (1988) Nature 334:585-591); hairpin structures(Smith, et al., (2000) Nature 407:319-320; WO 1999/53050; WO 2002/00904;WO 1998/53083; Chuang and Meyerowitz, (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA97:4985-4990; Stoutjesdijk, et al., (2002) Plant Physiol. 129:1723-1731;Waterhouse and Helliwell, (2003) Nat. Rev. Genet. 4:29-38; Pandolfini,et al., BMC Biotechnology 3:7, US Patent Application Publication Number2003/0175965; Panstruga, et al., (2003) Mol. Biol. Rep. 30:135-140;Wesley, et al., (2001) Plant J. 27:581-590; Wang and Waterhouse, (2001)Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 5:146-150; US Patent Application PublicationNumber 2003/0180945; and, WO 2002/00904, all of which are hereinincorporated by reference); ribozymes (Steinecke, et al., (1992) EMBO J.11:1525; and Perriman, et al., (1993) Antisense Res. Dev. 3:253);oligonucleotide-mediated targeted modification (e.g., WO 2003/076574 andWO 1999/25853); Zn-finger targeted molecules (e.g., WO 2001/52620; WO2003/048345; and WO 2000/42219); transposon tagging (Maes, et al.,(1999) Trends Plant Sci. 4:90-96; Dharmapuri and Sonti, (1999) FEMSMicrobiol. Lett. 179:53-59; Meissner, et al., (2000) Plant J.22:265-274; Phogat, et al., (2000) J. Biosci. 25:57-63; Walbot, (2000)Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2:103-107; Gai, et al., (2000) Nucleic AcidsRes. 28:94-96; Fitzmaurice, et al., (1999) Genetics 153:1919-1928;Bensen, et al., (1995) Plant Cell 7:75-84; Mena, et al., (1996) Science274:1537-1540 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,962,764); each of which is hereinincorporated by reference; and other methods or combinations of theabove methods known to those of skill in the art.

It is recognized that with the polynucleotides of the invention,antisense constructions, complementary to at least a portion of themessenger RNA (mRNA) for the AP2 transcription factor sequences can beconstructed. Antisense nucleotides are constructed to hybridize with thecorresponding mRNA. Modifications of the antisense sequences may be madeas long as the sequences hybridize to and interfere with expression ofthe corresponding mRNA. In this manner, antisense constructions having70%, optimally 80%, more optimally 85% sequence identity to thecorresponding antisensed sequences may be used. Furthermore, portions ofthe antisense nucleotides may be used to disrupt the expression of thetarget gene. Generally, sequences of at least 50 nucleotides, 100nucleotides, 200 nucleotides, 300, 400, 450, 500, 550 or greater may beused.

The polynucleotides of the present invention may also be used in thesense orientation to suppress the expression of endogenous genes inplants. Methods for suppressing gene expression in plants usingpolynucleotides in the sense orientation are known in the art. Themethods generally involve transforming plants with a DNA constructcomprising a promoter that drives expression in a plant operably linkedto at least a portion of a polynucleotide that corresponds to thetranscript of the endogenous gene. Typically, such a nucleotide sequencehas substantial sequence identity to the sequence of the transcript ofthe endogenous gene, optimally greater than about 65% sequence identity,more optimally greater than about 85% sequence identity, most optimallygreater than about 95% sequence identity. See, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,283,184and 5,034,323; herein incorporated by reference.

Thus, many methods may be used to reduce or eliminate the activity of anAP2 transcription factor polypeptide or a biologically active variant orfragment thereof. In addition, combinations of methods may be employedto reduce or eliminate the activity of at least one AP2 transcriptionfactor polypeptide. It is further recognized that the level of a singleAP2 transcription factor sequence can be modulated to produce thedesired phenotype. Alternatively, is may be desirable to modulate(increase and/or decrease) the level of expression of multiple sequenceshaving an AP2 transcription factor domain or a biologically activevariant or fragment thereof.

As discussed above, a variety of promoters can be employed to modulatethe level of the AP2 transcription factor sequence. In one embodiment,the expression of the heterologous polynucleotide which modulates thelevel of at least one AP2 transcription factor polypeptide can beregulated by a tissue-preferred promoter, particularly, a leaf-preferredpromoter (i.e., mesophyll-preferred promoter or a bundle sheathpreferred promoter) and/or a seed-preferred promoter (i.e., anendosperm-preferred promoter or an embryo-preferred promoter).

B. Methods to Modulate Floral Organ Development and Yield in a Plant

Auxin flux is implicated in patterning, initiation and growth of floralorgans by genetic and physiological analyses. The ETTIN/ARF3transcription factor responds to auxin to affect perianth organ numberand reproductive organ differentiation in the Arabidopsis flower(Pfluger and Zambryski, (2004) Development 131:4697-4707). The AP2transcription factor nucleic acid molecules of the invention encode aprotein that may transcriptionally co-repress the AGAMOUS floral organidentity gene. Additionally, AP2 transcription factor may play a role inauxin-regulated growth and development. AP2 transcription factor has apleiotropic phenotype that includes reductions in several classic auxinresponses such as apical dominance, lateral root initiation, sensitivityto exogenous auxin and activation of the DR5 auxin response reporter.

Accordingly, methods and compositions are provided to modulate AP2transcription factor and AP2 transcription factor polypeptides and thusto modulate floral organ development, root initiation, and yield inplants. In one embodiment, the compositions of the invention can be usedto increase grain yield in cereal plants. In this embodiment, the AP2transcription factor coding sequence is expressed in a cereal plant ofinterest to increase expression of the AP2 transcription factortranscription factor.

In this manner, the methods and compositions can be used to increaseyield in a plant. As used herein, the term “improved yield” means anyimprovement in the yield of any measured plant product. The improvementin yield can comprise a 0.1%, 0.5%, 1%, 3%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 30%, 40%,50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90% or greater increase in measured plant product.Alternatively, the increased plant yield can comprise about a 0.5 fold,1 fold, 2 fold, 4 fold, 8 fold, 16 fold or 32 fold increase in measuredplant products. For example, an increase in the bu/acre yield ofsoybeans or corn derived from a crop having the present treatment ascompared with the bu/acre yield from untreated soybeans or corncultivated under the same conditions would be considered an improvedyield. By increased yield is also intended at least one of an increasein total seed numbers, an increase in total seed weight, an increase inroot biomass and an increase in harvest index. Harvest index is definedas the ratio of yield biomass to the total cumulative biomass atharvest.

Accordingly, various methods to increase yield of a plant are provided.In one embodiment, increasing yield of a plant or plant part comprisesintroducing into the plant or plant part a heterologous polynucleotideand expressing the heterologous polynucleotide in the plant or plantpart. In this method, the expression of the heterologous polynucleotidemodulates the level of at least one AP2 transcription factor polypeptidein the plant or plant part, where the AP2 transcription factorpolypeptide comprises an AP2 transcription factor domain (or both)having an amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 5 (AP2transcription factor domain) or SEQ ID NO: 6 (polyglycine) or SEQ IDNOS: 7-11 (polyserine domains) or a variant or fragment of the domain.

In specific embodiments, modulation of the level of the AP2transcription factor polypeptide comprises an increase in the level ofat least one AP2 transcription factor polypeptide. In such methods, theheterologous polynucleotide introduced into the plant encodes apolypeptide having an AP2 transcription factor domain or a biologicallyactive variant or fragment thereof. In specific embodiments, theheterologous polynucleotide comprises the sequence set forth in at leastone SEQ ID NO: 1 and/or a biologically active variant or fragmentthereof.

In other embodiments, modulating the level of at least one AP2transcription factor polypeptide comprises decreasing in the level of atleast one AP2 transcription factor polypeptide. In such methods, theheterologous polynucleotide introduced into the plant need not encode afunctional AP2 transcription factor polypeptide, but rather theexpression of the polynucleotide results in the decreased expression ofan AP2 transcription factor polypeptide comprising an AP2 transcriptionfactor domain or a biologically active variant or fragment of the AP2transcription factor domain. In specific embodiments, the AP2transcription factor polypeptide having the decreased level is set forthin at least one of SEQ ID NO: 2 or SEQ ID NO: 4 or a biologically activevariant or fragment thereof.

The following examples are offered by way of illustration and not by wayof limitation.

EXPERIMENTAL Example 1 Cloning of AP2 Transcription Factor Gene

The cDNA that encoded the AP2 transcription factor polypeptide fromArabidopsis was identified by screening a population of activationtagged Arabidopsis plants for phenotypic variants with altered yieldcomponents. The AP2 gene was cloned by inverse PCR (iPCR) using primersdesigned to the activation tag. Activation of AP2 was verified byquantifying AP2 mRNA by RT-PCR. The phenotype of ectopic/overexpressionof AP2 was confirmed by cloning the genomic (intron containing) and cDNAversions of the AP2 gene in a transgene cassette with constitutivepromoters (SCP PRO) and the Arabidopsis Ubiquitin 10 promoter (AT-UBQ10)and transforming wild-type Arabidopsis (Columbia ecotype).

Transgenic Arabidopsis over-expressing the AT-AP2 gene, either under thecontrol of the constitutive SCP1 promoter or the constitutive AT-UBQ10promoter had greater number of siliques (pods) and branches (FIGS. 7 and8).

Example 2 Vector Construction

The full length Arabidopsis AP2 gene was amplified from cDNA or genomicDNA with primers designed to introduce RcaI and SfuI sites to facilitatecloning. The PCR amplification product was sequenced and introduced intoa plant expression vector containing the SCP Promoter and the PINIIterminator. This entry vector was subsequently cloned into a planttransformation vector using Gateway multisite cloning (Invitrogen),introduced into Agrobacterium tumafaciens by electroporation andtransformed into Arabidopsis by the floral dip method of Clough and Bent(Clough and Bent, (1998) Floral dip: a simplified method foragrobacterium-mediated transformation of arabidopsis thaliana, PlantJournal 16(6):735-743.

The full length Soybean AP2 gene was isolated by screening DuPont ESTlibraries using the BlastX algorithm and the Arabidopsis AP2 sequence astemplate. The full-length soybean AP2 was amplified from this EST usingprimers that introduced NcoI and SfuI restriction enzyme sites tofacilitate cloning. The full-length soybean AP2 was cloned into vectorsunder the control of the SCP1 and AT-UBQ10 promoters for constitutiveexpression in soybean.

Example 3 Rice Transformation Method

High-velocity ballistic bombardment using metal particles coated withthe nucleic acid constructs was used to transform wild-type rice (Klein,et al., (1987) Nature 327:70-73; U.S. Pat. No. 4,945,050, incorporatedby reference herein). A Biolistic PDS-1000/He (BioRAD Laboratories,Hercules, Calif.) was used for these complementation experiments. Theparticle bombardment technique was used to transform wild-type rice withthe pGOS2::ZM-AP2 transcription factor. The bacterial hygromycin Bphosphotransferase (Hpt II) gene from Streptomyces hygroscopicus (whichconfers resistance to the antibiotic) was used as the selectable markerfor rice transformation. In the vector, pML18, the Hpt II gene wasengineered with the 35S promoter from Cauliflower Mosaic Virus and thetermination and polyadenylation signals from the octopine synthase geneof Agrobacterium tumefaciens. pML18 is described in WO 1997/47731, thedisclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.

Embryogenic callus cultures derived from the scutellum of germinatingrice seeds served as source material for transformation experiments.This material is generated by germinating sterile rice seeds on a callusinitiation media (MS salts, Nitsch and Nitsch vitamins, 1.0 mg/l 2,4-Dand 10 μM AgNO₃) in the dark at 27-28° C. Embryogenic callusproliferating from the scutellum of the embryos is then transferred toCM media (N6 salts, Nitsch and Nitsch vitamins, 1 mg/l 2,4-D; Chu, etal., (1985) Sci. Sinica 18:659-668). Callus cultures are maintained onCM by routine sub-culture at two week intervals and used fortransformation within 10 weeks of initiation. Callus is prepared fortransformation by subculturing 0.5-1.0 mm pieces approximately 1 mmapart, arranged in a circular area of about 4 cm in diameter, in thecenter of a circle of Whatman® #541 paper placed on CM media. The plateswith callus are incubated in the dark at 27-28° C. for 3-5 days. Priorto bombardment, the filters with callus are transferred to CMsupplemented with 0.25 M mannitol and 0.25 M sorbitol for 3 hr in thedark. The petri dish lids are then left ajar for 20-45 minutes in asterile hood to allow moisture on tissue to dissipate.

Each DNA fragment was co-precipitated with pML18 containing theselectable marker for rice transformation onto the surface of goldparticles. To accomplish this, a total of 10 μg of DNA at a 2:1 ratio oftrait:selectable marker DNAs were added to a 50 μl aliquot of goldparticles that had been resuspended at a concentration of 60 mg ml⁻¹.Calcium chloride (50 μl of a 2.5 M solution) and spermidine (20 μl of a0.1 M solution) were then added to the gold-DNA suspension as the tubewas vortexing for 3 min. The gold particles were centrifuged in amicrofuge for 1 second and the supernatant removed. The gold particleswere then washed twice with 1 ml of absolute ethanol and resuspended in50 μl of absolute ethanol and sonicated (bath sonicator) for one secondto disperse the gold particles. The gold suspension was incubated at−70° C. for five minutes and sonicated (bath sonicator) to disperse theparticles. Six μl of the DNA-coated gold particles was then loaded ontomylar macrocarrier disks and the ethanol was allowed to evaporate.

At the end of the drying period, a petri dish containing the tissue wasplaced in the chamber of the PDS-1000/He. The air in the chamber wasthen evacuated to a vacuum of 28-29 inches Hg. The macrocarrier wasaccelerated with a helium shock wave using a rupture membrane thatbursts when the He pressure in the shock tube reaches 1080-1100 psi. Thetissue was placed approximately 8 cm from the stopping screen and thecallus was bombarded two times. Two to four plates of tissue werebombarded in this way with the DNA-coated gold particles. Followingbombardment, the callus tissue was transferred to CM media withoutsupplemental sorbitol or mannitol.

Three to five days after bombardment, the callus tissue was transferredto SM media (CM medium containing 50 mg/l hygromycin). To accomplishthis, callus tissue was transferred from plates to sterile 50 ml conicaltubes and weighed. Molten top-agar at 40° C. was added using 2.5 ml oftop agar/100 mg of callus. Callus clumps were broken into fragments ofless than 2 mm diameter by repeated dispensing through a 10 ml pipette.Three ml aliquots of the callus suspension were plated onto fresh SMmedia and the plates were incubated in the dark for 4 weeks at 27-28° C.After 4 weeks, transgenic callus events were identified, transferred tofresh SM plates and grown for an additional 2 weeks in the dark at27-28° C.

Growing callus was transferred to RM1 media (MS salts, Nitsch and Nitschvitamins, 2% sucrose, 3% sorbitol, 0.4% Gelrite®+50 ppm hyg B) for 2weeks in the dark at 25° C. After 2 weeks the callus was transferred toRM2 media (MS salts, Nitsch and Nitsch vitamins, 3% sucrose, 0.4%Gelrite®+50 ppm hyg B) and placed under cool white light (˜40 μEm⁻²s⁻¹)with a 12 hr photoperiod at 25° C. and 30-40% humidity. After 2-4 weeksin the light, callus began to organize and form shoots. Shoots wereremoved from surrounding callus/media and gently transferred to RM3media (½×MS salts, Nitsch and Nitsch vitamins, 1% sucrose+50 ppmhygromycin B) in Phytatrays™ (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.) andincubation was continued using the same conditions as described in theprevious step. The resultant TO transformants were transferred from RM3to 4″ pots containing Metro Mix® 350 after 2-3 weeks, when sufficientroot and shoot growth had occurred.

Example 4 Expression of AP2 Transcription Factor in Soybean

The Arabidospis AP2 gene and the soy AP2 gene in plant transformationvectors under the control of constitutive plant promoters (AT-UBQ10 andSCP PRO) were transformed into soybean using biolistic methods.Over-expression of the Arabidopsis AP2 gene or soy AP2 gene in soybeanis expected to increase flower or pod number, branch number or increasethe retention of soybean flowers or pods. An increase in one or more ofthese components is expected to increase yield in soybean.

Example 5 Overexpression of AP2 Transcription Factor Sequences in Maize

Immature maize embryos from greenhouse donor plants are bombarded with aplasmid containing an AP2 transcription factor sequence (such as Zm-AP2transcription factor/SEQ ID NO: 1) under the control of the UBI promoterand the selectable marker gene PAT (Wohlleben, et al., (1988) Gene70:25-37), which confers resistance to the herbicide Bialaphos.Alternatively, the selectable marker gene is provided on a separateplasmid. Transformation is performed as follows. Media recipes followbelow.

Preparation of Target Tissue

The ears are husked and surface sterilized in 30% Clorox® bleach plus0.5% Micro detergent for 20 minutes, and rinsed two times with sterilewater. The immature embryos are excised and placed embryo axis side down(scutellum side up), 25 embryos per plate, on 560Y medium for 4 hoursand then aligned within the 2.5 cm target zone in preparation forbombardment.

A plasmid vector comprising the AP2 transcription factor sequenceoperably linked to a ubiquitin promoter is made. This plasmid DNA plusplasmid DNA containing a PAT selectable marker is precipitated onto 1.1μm (average diameter) tungsten pellets using a CaCl₂ precipitationprocedure as follows: 100 μl prepared tungsten particles in water; 10 μl(1 μg) DNA in Tris EDTA buffer (1 μg total DNA); 100 μl 2.5 M CaCl₂;and, 10 μl 0.1 M spermidine.

Each reagent is added sequentially to the tungsten particle suspension,while maintained on the multitube vortexer. The final mixture issonicated briefly and allowed to incubate under constant vortexing for10 minutes. After the precipitation period, the tubes are centrifugedbriefly, liquid removed, washed with 500 ml 100% ethanol, andcentrifuged for 30 seconds. Again the liquid is removed, and 105 μl 100%ethanol is added to the final tungsten particle pellet. For particle gunbombardment, the tungsten/DNA particles are briefly sonicated and 10 μlspotted onto the center of each macrocarrier and allowed to dry about 2minutes before bombardment.

The sample plates are bombarded at level #4 in particle gun (U.S. Pat.No. 5,240,855). All samples receive a single shot at 650 PSI, with atotal of ten aliquots taken from each tube of prepared particles/DNA.

Following bombardment, the embryos are kept on 560Y medium for 2 days,then transferred to 560R selection medium containing 3 mg/literBialaphos, and subcultured every 2 weeks. After approximately 10 weeksof selection, selection-resistant callus clones are transferred to 288Jmedium to initiate plant regeneration. Following somatic embryomaturation (2-4 weeks), well-developed somatic embryos are transferredto medium for germination and transferred to the lighted culture room.Approximately 7-10 days later, developing plantlets are transferred to272V hormone-free medium in tubes for 7-10 days until plantlets are wellestablished. Plants are then transferred to inserts in flats (equivalentto 2.5″ pot) containing potting soil and grown for 1 week in a growthchamber, subsequently grown an additional 1-2 weeks in the greenhouse,then transferred to classic 600 pots (1.6 gallon) and grown to maturity.Plants are monitored and scored for an increase in nitrogen useefficiency, increase yield, or an increase in stress tolerance.

Bombardment medium (560Y) comprises 4.0 g/l N6 basal salts (SIGMAC-1416), 1.0 ml/I Eriksson's Vitamin Mix (1000× SIGMA-1511), 0.5 mg/lthiamine HCl, 120.0 g/l sucrose, 1.0 mg/l 2,4-D, and 2.88 g/l L-proline(brought to volume with D-I H₂O following adjustment to pH 5.8 withKOH); 2.0 g/l Gelrite® (added after bringing to volume with D-I H₂O);and 8.5 mg/l silver nitrate (added after sterilizing the medium andcooling to room temperature). Selection medium (560R) comprises 4.0 g/lN6 basal salts (SIGMA C-1416), 1.0 ml/I Eriksson's Vitamin Mix (1000×SIGMA-1511), 0.5 mg/l thiamine HCl, 30.0 g/l sucrose, and 2.0 mg/l 2,4-D(brought to volume with D-I H₂O following adjustment to pH 5.8 withKOH); 3.0 g/l Gelrite® (added after bringing to volume with D-I H₂O);and 0.85 mg/l silver nitrate and 3.0 mg/l bialaphos (both added aftersterilizing the medium and cooling to room temperature).

Plant regeneration medium (288J) comprises 4.3 g/l MS salts (GIBCO11117-074), 5.0 ml/I MS vitamins stock solution (0.100 g nicotinic acid,0.02 g/l thiamine HCL, 0.10 g/l pyridoxine HCL, and 0.40 g/l glycinebrought to volume with polished D-I H₂O) (Murashige and Skoog, (1962)Physiol. Plant. 15:473), 100 mg/l myo-inositol, 0.5 mg/l zeatin, 60 g/lsucrose, and 1.0 ml/I of 0.1 mM abscisic acid (brought to volume withpolished D-I H₂O after adjusting to pH 5.6); 3.0 g/l Gelrite® (addedafter bringing to volume with D-I H₂O); and 1.0 mg/l indoleacetic acidand 3.0 mg/l bialaphos (added after sterilizing the medium and coolingto 60° C.). Hormone-free medium (272V) comprises 4.3 g/l MS salts (GIBCO11117-074), 5.0 ml/I MS vitamins stock solution (0.100 g/l nicotinicacid, 0.02 g/l thiamine HCL, 0.10 g/l pyridoxine HCL, and 0.40 g/lglycine brought to volume with polished D-I H₂O), 0.1 g/l myo-inositol,and 40.0 g/l sucrose (brought to volume with polished D-I H₂O afteradjusting pH to 5.6); and 6 g/l Bacto™-agar (added after bringing tovolume with polished D-I H₂O), sterilized and cooled to 60° C.

Example 6 Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation

For Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of maize with an AP2transcription factor polynucleotide the method of Zhao is employed (U.S.Pat. No. 5,981,840, and PCT Patent Publication Number WO 1998/32326; thecontents of which are hereby incorporated by reference). Briefly,immature embryos are isolated from maize and the embryos contacted witha suspension of Agrobacterium, where the bacteria are capable oftransferring the AP2 transcription factor polynucleotide to at least onecell of at least one of the immature embryos (step 1: the infectionstep). In this step the immature embryos are immersed in anAgrobacterium suspension for the initiation of inoculation. The embryosare co-cultured for a time with the Agrobacterium (step 2: theco-cultivation step). The immature embryos are cultured on solid mediumfollowing the infection step. Following this co-cultivation period anoptional “resting” step is contemplated. In this resting step, theembryos are incubated in the presence of at least one antibiotic knownto inhibit the growth of Agrobacterium without the addition of aselective agent for plant transformants (step 3: resting step). Theimmature embryos are cultured on solid medium with antibiotic, butwithout a selecting agent, for elimination of Agrobacterium and for aresting phase for the infected cells. Next, inoculated embryos arecultured on medium containing a selective agent and growing transformedcallus is recovered (step 4: the selection step). The immature embryosare cultured on solid medium with a selective agent resulting in theselective growth of transformed cells. The callus is then regeneratedinto plants (step 5: the regeneration step), and calli grown onselective medium are cultured on solid medium to regenerate the plants.

Example 7 Soybean Embryo Transformation Culture Conditions

Soybean embryogenic suspension cultures (cv. Jack) are maintained in 35ml liquid medium SB196 (see recipes below) on rotary shaker, 150 rpm,26° C. with cool white fluorescent lights on 16:8 hr day/nightphotoperiod at light intensity of 60-85 μE/m2/s. Cultures aresubcultured every 7 days to two weeks by inoculating approximately 35 mgof tissue into 35 ml of fresh liquid SB196 (the preferred subcultureinterval is every 7 days).

Soybean embryogenic suspension cultures are transformed with theplasmids and DNA fragments described in the following examples by themethod of particle gun bombardment (Klein, et al., (1987) Nature327:70).

Soybean Embryogenic Suspension Culture Initiation

Soybean cultures are initiated twice each month with 5-7 days betweeneach initiation. Pods with immature seeds from available soybean plants45-55 days after planting are picked, removed from their shells andplaced into a sterilized magenta box. The soybean seeds are sterilizedby shaking them for 15 minutes in a 5% Clorox® solution with 1 drop ofivory soap (95 ml of autoclaved distilled water plus 5 ml Clorox® and 1drop of soap). Mix well. Seeds are rinsed using 2 1-liter bottles ofsterile distilled water and those less than 4 mm are placed onindividual microscope slides. The small end of the seed are cut and thecotyledons pressed out of the seed coat. Cotyledons are transferred toplates containing SB1 medium (25-30 cotyledons per plate). Plates arewrapped with fiber tape and stored for 8 weeks. After this timesecondary embryos are cut and placed into SB196 liquid media for 7 days.

Preparation of DNA for Bombardment Either an intact plasmid or a DNAplasmid fragment containing the genes of interest and the selectablemarker gene are used for bombardment. Plasmid DNA for bombardment areroutinely prepared and purified using the method described in thePromega™ Protocols and Applications Guide, Second Edition (page 106).Fragments of the plasmids carrying an AP2 transcription factorpolynucleotide are obtained by gel isolation of double digestedplasmids. In each case, 100 μg of plasmid DNA is digested in 0.5 ml ofthe specific enzyme mix that is appropriate for the plasmid of interest.The resulting DNA fragments are separated by gel electrophoresis on 1%SeaPlaque GTG agarose (BioWhitaker Molecular Applications) and the DNAfragments containing the AP2 transcription factor polynucleotide are cutfrom the agarose gel. DNA is purified from the agarose using the GELasedigesting enzyme following the manufacturer's protocol.

A 50 μl aliquot of sterile distilled water containing 3 mg of goldparticles (3 mg gold) is added to 5 μl of a 1 μg/μl DNA solution (eitherintact plasmid or DNA fragment prepared as described above), 50 μl 2.5MCaCl₂ and 20 μl of 0.1 M spermidine. The mixture is shaken 3 min onlevel 3 of a vortex shaker and spun for 10 sec in a bench microfuge.After a wash with 400 μl 100% ethanol the pellet is suspended bysonication in 40 μl of 100% ethanol. Five μl of DNA suspension isdispensed to each flying disk of the Biolistic PDS1000/HE instrumentdisk. Each 5 μl aliquot contains approximately 0.375 mg gold perbombardment (i.e., per disk).

Tissue Preparation and Bombardment with DNA

Approximately 150-200 mg of 7 day old embryonic suspension cultures areplaced in an empty, sterile 60×15 mm petri dish and the dish coveredwith plastic mesh. Tissue is bombarded 1 or 2 shots per plate withmembrane rupture pressure set at 1100 PSI and the chamber evacuated to avacuum of 27-28 inches of mercury. Tissue is placed approximately 3.5inches from the retaining/stopping screen.

Selection of Transformed Embryos

Transformed embryos were selected either using hygromycin (when thehygromycin phosphotransferase, HPT, gene was used as the selectablemarker) or chlorsulfuron (when the acetolactate synthase, ALS, gene wasused as the selectable marker).

Hygromycin (HPT) Selection

Following bombardment, the tissue is placed into fresh SB196 media andcultured as described above. Six days post-bombardment, the SB196 isexchanged with fresh SB196 containing a selection agent of 30 mg/Lhygromycin. The selection media is refreshed weekly. Four to six weekspost selection, green, transformed tissue may be observed growing fromuntransformed, necrotic embryogenic clusters. Isolated, green tissue isremoved and inoculated into multiwell plates to generate new, clonallypropagated, transformed embryogenic suspension cultures.

Chlorsulfuron (ALS) Selection

Following bombardment, the tissue is divided between 2 flasks with freshSB196 media and cultured as described above. Six to seven dayspost-bombardment, the SB196 is exchanged with fresh SB196 containingselection agent of 100 ng/ml Chlorsulfuron. The selection media isrefreshed weekly. Four to six weeks post selection, green, transformedtissue may be observed growing from untransformed, necrotic embryogenicclusters. Isolated, green tissue is removed and inoculated intomultiwell plates containing SB196 to generate new, clonally propagated,transformed embryogenic suspension cultures.

Regeneration of Soybean Somatic Embryos into Plants

In order to obtain whole plants from embryogenic suspension cultures,the tissue must be regenerated.

Embryo Maturation

Embryos are cultured for 4-6 weeks at 26° C. in SB196 under cool whitefluorescent (Phillips cool white Econowatt F40/CW/RS/EW) and Agro(Phillips F40 Agro) bulbs (40 watt) on a 16:8 hr photoperiod with lightintensity of 90-120 uE/m2s. After this time embryo clusters are removedto a solid agar media, SB166, for 1-2 weeks. Clusters are thensubcultured to medium SB103 for 3 weeks. During this period, individualembryos can be removed from the clusters and screened for levels of AP2transcription factor expression and/or activity.

Embryo Desiccation and Germination

Matured individual embryos are desiccated by placing them into an empty,small petri dish (35×10 mm) for approximately 4-7 days. The plates aresealed with fiber tape (creating a small humidity chamber). Desiccatedembryos are planted into SB71-4 medium where they were left to germinateunder the same culture conditions described above. Germinated plantletsare removed from germination medium and rinsed thoroughly with water andthen planted in Redi-Earth in 24-cell pack tray, covered with clearplastic dome. After 2 weeks the dome is removed and plants hardened offfor a further week. If plantlets looked hardy they are transplanted to10″ pot of Redi-Earth with up to 3 plantlets per pot. After 10 to 16weeks, mature seeds are harvested, chipped and analyzed for proteins.

Media Recipes

SB 196 - FN Lite liquid proliferation medium (per liter) MS FeEDTA -100x Stock 1 10 ml MS Sulfate - 100x Stock 2 10 ml FN Lite Halides -100x Stock 3 10 ml FN Lite P, B, Mo - 100x Stock 4 10 ml B5 vitamins (1ml/L) 1.0 ml 2,4-D (10 mg/L final concentration) 1.0 ml KNO₃ 2.83 gm(NH₄)₂SO₄ 0.463 gm Asparagine 1.0 gm Sucrose (1%) 10 gm pH 5.8

FN Lite Stock Solutions

Stock # 1000 ml 500 ml 1 MS Fe EDTA 100x Stock Na₂ EDTA* 3.724 g 1.862 gFeSO₄—7H₂O 2.784 g 1.392 g 2 MS Sulfate 100x stock MgSO₄—7H₂O 37.0 g18.5 g MnSO₄—H₂O 1.69 g 0.845 g ZnSO₄—7H₂O 0.86 g 0.43 g CuSO₄—5H₂O0.0025 g 0.00125 g 3 FN Lite Halides 100x Stock CaCl₂—2H₂O 30.0 g 15.0 gKI 0.083 g 0.0715 g CoCl₂—6H₂O 0.0025 g 0.00125 g 4 FN Lite P, B, Mo100x Stock KH₂PO₄ 18.5 g 9.25 g H₃BO₃ 0.62 g 0.31 g Na₂MoO₄—2H₂O 0.025 g0.0125 g *Add first, dissolve in dark bottle while stirring

SB1 solid medium (per liter) comprises: 1 pkg. MS salts(GIBCO/BRL—Cat#11117-066); 1 ml B5 vitamins 1000× stock; 31.5 g sucrose;2 ml 2,4-D (20 mg/L final concentration); pH 5.7; and, 8 g TC agar.

SB 166 solid medium (per liter) comprises: 1 pkg. MS salts(GIBCO/BRL—Cat#11117-066); 1 ml B5 vitamins 1000× stock; 60 g maltose;750 mg MgCl₂ hexahydrate; 5 g activated charcoal; pH 5.7; and, 2 gGelrite®.

SB 103 solid medium (per liter) comprises: 1 pkg. MS salts(GIBCO/BRL—Cat#11117-066); 1 ml B5 vitamins 1000× stock; 60 g maltose;750 mg MgCl2 hexahydrate; pH 5.7; and, 2 g Gelrite®.

SB 71-4 solid medium (per liter) comprises: 1 bottle Gamborg's B5 saltsw/sucrose (GIBCO/BRL—Cat#21153-036); pH 5.7; and, 5 g TC agar.

2,4-D stock is obtained premade from Phytotech cat# D 295—concentrationis 1 mg/ml.

B5 Vitamins Stock (per 100 ml) which is stored in aliquots at −20° C.comprises: 10 g myo-inositol; 100 mg nicotinic acid; 100 mg pyridoxineHCl; and, 1 g thiamine. If the solution does not dissolve quicklyenough, apply a low level of heat via the hot stir plate.

Chlorsulfuron Stock comprises: 1 mg/ml in 0.01 N Ammonium Hydroxide.

Example 8 Variants of AP2 Transcription Factor

A. Variant Nucleotide Sequences of AP2 Transcription Factor that do notAlter the Encoded Amino Acid Sequence

The AP2 nucleotide sequences set forth in SEQ ID NOS: 1 and 3 are usedto generate variant nucleotide sequences having the nucleotide sequenceof the open reading frame with about 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90% or 95%nucleotide sequence identity when compared to the corresponding startingunaltered ORF nucleotide sequence. These functional variants aregenerated using a standard codon table. While the nucleotide sequence ofthe variant is altered, the amino acid sequence encoded by the openreading frame does not change.

B. Variant Amino Acid Sequences of AP2 Transcription Factor

Variant amino acid sequences of AP2 are generated. In this example, oneor more amino acids are altered. Specifically, the open reading frameset forth in SEQ ID NOS: 2 or 4 are reviewed to determine theappropriate amino acid alteration. The selection of an amino acid tochange is made by consulting a protein alignment with orthologs andother gene family members from various species. See, FIGS. 1 and 2. Anamino acid is selected that is deemed not to be under high selectionpressure (not highly conserved) and which is rather easily substitutedby an amino acid with similar chemical characteristics (i.e., similarfunctional side-chain). Assays as outlined elsewhere herein may befollowed to confirm functionality. Variants having about 70%, 75%, 80%,85%, 90% or 95% nucleic acid sequence identity to each of SEQ ID NOS: 1or 3 are generated using this method.

C. Additional Variant Amino Acid Sequences of AP2 Transcription Factor.

In this example, artificial protein sequences are created having 80%,85%, 90% and 95% identity relative to the reference protein sequence.This latter effort requires identifying conserved and variable regionsfrom the alignment set forth in FIGS. 1 and 2 and then the judiciousapplication of an amino acid substitutions table. These parts will bediscussed in more detail below.

Largely, the determination of which amino acid sequences are altered ismade based on the conserved regions among the AP2 transcription factorproteins or among the other AP2 transcription factor polypeptides. See,FIGS. 1 and 2. Based on the sequence alignment, the various regions ofthe polypeptides that can likely be altered can be determined. It isrecognized that conservative substitutions can be made in the conservedregions without altering function. In addition, one of skill willunderstand that functional variants of the AP2 transcription factorsequence of the invention can have minor non-conserved amino acidalterations in the conserved domain.

Artificial protein sequences are then created that are different fromthe original in the intervals of 80-85%, 85-90%, 90-95% and 95-100%identity. Midpoints of these intervals are targeted, with liberallatitude of plus or minus 1%, for example. The amino acids substitutionswill be effected by a custom Perl script. The substitution table isprovided below in Table 1.

First, any conserved amino acids in the protein that should not bechanged are identified and “marked off” for insulation from thesubstitution. The start methionine will of course be added to this listautomatically. Next, the changes are made.

H, C and P are not changed. The changes will occur with isoleucinefirst, sweeping N-terminal to C-terminal. Then leucine, and so on downthe list until the desired target is reached. Interim numbersubstitutions can be made so as not to cause reversal of changes. Thelist is ordered 1-17, so start with as many isoleucine changes as neededbefore leucine, and so on down to methionine. Clearly many amino acidswill in this manner not need to be changed. L, I and V will involve a50:50 substitution of the two alternate optimal substitutions.

The variant amino acid sequences are written as output. Perl script isused to calculate the percent identities. Using this procedure, variantsof AP2 transcription factor are generated having about 82%, 87%, 92% and97% amino acid identity to the starting unaltered ORF nucleotidesequence of SEQ ID NOS: 1 or 3.

TABLE 1 Substitution Table Strongly Rank of Similar Order and Optimal toAmino Acid Substitution Change Comment I L, V 1 50:50 substitution L I,V 2 50:50 substitution V I, L 3 50:50 substitution A G 4 G A 5 D E 6 E D7 W Y 8 Y W 9 S T 10 T S 11 K R 12 R K 13 N Q 14 Q N 15 F Y 16 M L 17First methionine cannot change H Na No good substitutes C Na No goodsubstitutes P Na No good substitutes

The article “a” and “an” are used herein to refer to one or more thanone (i.e., to at least one) of the grammatical object of the article. Byway of example, “an element” means one or more element.

All publications and patent applications mentioned in the specificationare indicative of the level of those skilled in the art to which thisinvention pertains. All publications and patent applications are hereinincorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individualpublication or patent application was specifically and individuallyindicated to be incorporated by reference.

Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail byway of illustration and example for purposes of clarity ofunderstanding, certain changes and modifications may be practiced withinthe scope of the appended claims.

That which is claimed:
 1. An isolated polynucleotide having AP2transcription factor activity and comprising a nucleotide sequenceselected from the group consisting of: (a) the nucleotide sequence setforth in SEQ ID NO: 1; (b) a nucleotide sequence encoding the amino acidsequence of SEQ ID NO:2; (c) a nucleotide sequence having at least 90%sequence identity to SEQ ID NO: 1, wherein said nucleotide sequenceencodes a polypeptide having AP2 transcription factor protein activity;(d) a nucleotide sequence comprising at least 99 consecutive nucleotidesof SEQ ID NO: 3 or a complement thereof; and, (e) a nucleotide sequenceencoding an amino acid sequence having at least 80% sequence identity toSEQ ID NO: 2, wherein said nucleotide sequence encodes a polypeptidehaving AP2 transcription factor protein activity., (f) a nucleotidesequence encoding an amino acid sequence having at least 90% sequenceidentity to SEQ ID NO:5.
 2. An expression cassette comprising thepolynucleotide of claim
 1. 3. The expression cassette of claim 2,wherein said polynucleotide is operably linked to a promoter that drivesexpression in a plant.
 4. The expression cassette of claim 3, whereinsaid polynucleotide is operably linked to a constitutive promoter.
 5. Atransgenic plant comprising the expression cassette of claim 3 or claim4.
 6. The transgenic plant of claim 5, wherein said plant is maize,wheat, rice, barley, sorghum, rye, soybean, brassica, or sunflower.
 7. Aplant that is genetically modified at a native genomic locus, saidgenomic locus comprising a polynucleotide of claim 1, wherein the AP2transcription activity of said plant is modulated.
 8. A transgenic plantcomprising a polynucleotide operably linked to a promoter that drivesexpression in the plant, wherein said polynucleotide comprises anucleotide sequence of claim 1, and wherein the AP2 transcription factorlevel in said plant is modulated relative to a control plant.
 9. Theplant of claim 5, wherein said plant has an increased level of apolypeptide selected from the group consisting of: (a) a polypeptidecomprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 2; (b) a polypeptidehaving at least 90% sequence identity to SEQ ID NO: 2, wherein saidpolypeptide has AP2 transcription factor protein activity; and (c) apolypeptide comprising an AP2 transcription factor domain set forth inSEQ ID NO:
 5. 10. The plant of claim 5, wherein said plant has aphenotype selected from the group consisting of: (a) an increased totalseed number; (b) an increased total seed weight; (c) an increasedharvest index; and (d) an increased biomass.
 11. A method of increasingthe level of a polypeptide in a plant comprising introducing into saidplant the expression cassette of claim 3 or claim
 4. 12. The method ofclaim 11, wherein the yield of the plant is increased.
 13. The method ofclaim 11, wherein increasing the level of said polypeptide produces aphenotype in the plant selected from the group consisting of: (a) anincreased total seed number; (b) an increased total seed weight; (c) anincreased harvest index; and (d) an increased biomass.
 14. The method ofclaim 12, wherein said expression cassette is stably integrated into thegenome of the plant.
 15. The method of claim 14, wherein said plant ismaize, wheat, rice, barley, sorghum, rye, soybean, brassica orsunflower.
 16. A method of increasing yield in a plant comprisingincreasing expression of an AP2 transcription factor polypeptide in saidplant, wherein said AP2 transcription factor polypeptide has AP2transcription factor protein activity and is selected from the groupconsisting of: (a) a polypeptide comprising an amino acid sequencehaving at least 80% sequence identity to the sequence set forth in SEQID NO:2; (b) a polypeptide comprising an AP2 transcription factor domainset forth in SEQ ID NO:5; and, (c) a polypeptide comprising an AP2transcription factor domain set forth in SEQ ID NO: 5 and a polyserineor polyglycine domain set forth in SEQ ID NO: 6-11.
 17. The method ofclaim 16, wherein said polypeptide comprises an amino acid sequencehaving at least 95% sequence identity with the sequence set forth in SEQID NO:
 5. 18. The method of claim 16, wherein said polypeptide comprisesthe amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:
 5. 19. The method ofclaim 16, comprising introducing into said plant an expression cassettecomprising a polynucleotide encoding said AP2 transcription factorpolypeptide operably linked to a promoter that drives expression in aplant cell, wherein said polynucleotide comprises a nucleotide sequenceselected from the group consisting of: (a) the nucleotide sequence setforth in SEQ ID NO: 1; (b) a nucleotide sequence encoding thepolypeptide of SEQ ID NO: 2; (c) a nucleotide sequence comprising atleast 95% sequence identity to the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1;(d) a nucleotide sequence encoding a polypeptide comprising the aminoacid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 2 or 5; and, (e) a nucleotidesequence encoding an amino acid sequence having at least 90% sequenceidentity to the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 2 or
 5. 20. The methodof claim 19, comprising: (a) transforming a plant cell with saidexpression cassette; and (b) regenerating a transformed plant from thetransformed plant cell of step (a).
 21. The method of claim 19, whereinsaid expression cassette is stably incorporated into the sequence of theplant.
 22. The method of claim 19, wherein said promoter is aconstitutive promoter.
 23. An isolated polypeptide comprising an aminoacid sequence selected from the group consisting of: (a) the amino acidsequence comprising SEQ ID NO: 2, 4 or 5; (b) the amino acid sequencecomprising at least 90% sequence identity to SEQ ID NO: 2, 4 or 5,wherein said polypeptide has the ability to modulate transcription; and,(c) the amino acid sequence comprising at least 33 consecutive aminoacids of SEQ ID NO: 2, 4 or 5, wherein said polypeptide retains theability to modulate transcription.